VOL 2 NO 5 - 5/67 - Highlights: Jew Harrassment Announcement - and - God Commands Racial Segregation by Bertrand Comparet - and - Disciples Of The Devil by Col. Cameron - and - The Church Militant And Jews from Catholic Publication ... More

ITEMS TO REMEMBER

• Every official of Government in this Christian, Constitutional Republic of the United States of America, is under OATH to UPHOLD, PRESERVE and DEFEND the CONSTITUTION of the United States.

• The statutes provide that the violation of the OATH OF OFFICE is a CRIMINAL ACT (a felony).

• The CONSTITUTION is the SUPREME LAW of this Union of States and a TREATY is only a law IF IT IS IN PURSUANCE OF THE CONSTITUTION!

• The Preamble to the Constitution says “We the people, IN ORDER TO FORM A MORE PERFECT UNION…” (more perfect from what ? ?) - Obviously more perfect from the UNION OF STATES that was formed under the Articles of Confederation).

• The Articles of Confederation came from the BIBLE! ALL LAW stems from the BIBLE! GOD gave us LAWS!

• Therefore the source of the Constitution is the Holy Bible!

• The Constitution was not acceptable to the States until the First Ten Amendments known as the Bill of Rights was made a part thereof.

• The 9^th and 10^th Amendments make it clear that the Federal government has only those POWERS (NO rights) given by the States IN THE CONSTITUTION.

• The Supreme Court of the United States is NOT given the power to “interpret” the Constitution, therefor IT DOES NOT HAVE THAT POWER. It only has the power to “RULE ON CASES AT LAW” - and a case at law is where an “act of a legislature” is questioned by a lawsuit. Any ruling of the Court must be based upon the CONSTITUTION.

• A REPUBLIC is a government of LAW, not of men nor of men’s opinions.

 §§§§§§§§§§§§§

---

GOD COMMANDS RACIAL SEGREGATION

By Bertrand L. Comparet

In the Bible, God repeatedly warns us against any mixing of the races - and especially against intermarriage and mongrelization. Some of this has been overlooked because of imperfect translation out of the Hebrew and Greek languages in which the Bible was written. Let us examine some of these passages carefully noting the exact meaning of the words used in the original tongues.

From the very beginning, the commandment not to permit mongrelization is strongly emphasized. For example:

exodus 20:24, “So shall we be separated, I and all of thy people, from the people that are upon the face of the earth.”

leviticus 20:24, “I am the Lord thy God which has separated you from other people.”

joshua 23:12-13, “…if ye do in any wise go back and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriage with them, and go unto them and they unto you; know for a certainty…that they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish off from this good land which the Lord your God has given you.”

deuteronomy 7:3, “Neither shalt thou make marriage with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.”

Many warnings are given in the Bible not to mate with the “stranger” - but the Hebrew words translated “stranger” in these verses are “ZUWR”, “NEKAR” and “NOKRI” - and each one means “a person of a DIFFERENT RACE FROM OURS.”

There are other Hebrew words - “ger” and “toshab” - meaning persons who are aliens only in a political sense, but of our race. The warning against race-mixing is always against those “strangers” who are ZUWR or NEKAR, for example:

proverbs 22:14, “The mouth of a strange (ZUWR) woman is a deep pit: he that is abhorred of the Lord shall fall therein.”

proverbs 23:27, For a whore is a deep ditch; and a strange (ZUWR) woman is a narrow pit.”

The reason for the warning is clear. MONGRELIZATION IS THE WORST FORM OF GENOCIDE. If you kill 99 percent of a race, but leave the other one percent pure-Blood, they will in time restore the race; but when you mongrelize them, you have destroyed that race eternally. Once mixed with the Black or Yellow races, the White race would be totally and forever destroyed. Hence God has forbidden it!

psalm 144:11-12, “Rid me and deliver me from the hand of strange (NEKAR) children whose mouth speaketh vanity and their right hand is a right hand of falsehood; that OUR SONS may be as plants grown up in their youth, that OUR DAUGHTERS may be as the polished cornices of a palace.”

jeremiah 2:21-25, Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed. How then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange (ZUWR) vine unto me? Withhold thy foot from being unshod, and throat from thirst; but thou saidst, ‘There is no hope; no; for I HAVE LOVED STRANGERS (ZUWR) AND AFTER THEM WILL I GO.”

hosea 5:6-7, “They shall go with their flocks and their herds to seek the Lord but they shall not find Him: He hath withdrawn Himself from them. THEY HAVE DEALT TREACHEROUSLY AGAINST THE LORD: FOR THEY HAVE BEGOTTEN STRANGE (ZUWR) CHILDREN.”

Noah was saved because he was pure-blooded while those around him were mongrelized.

See genesis 6:2-5, which records the forbidden mixing of races and the evil results thereof. But of Noah, genesis 6:9, “Noah was a just man and perfect (Hebrew taw-me-em means without blemish) in his generations (Hebrew to-led-aw means descent or ancestry).”

Hence Noah and his family were saved while the mongrels were wiped out.

MONGRELIZATION IS THE SIN FOR WHICH SODOM AND GOMORRAH WERE DESTROYED!

jude 7, “Even as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”

Those who seek to force integration in the schools and Churches are now beginning to admit that their real purpose is to bring about RACIAL INTERMARRIAGE. They have even deceived certain well-meaning but ignorant clergymen into helping them. Even without intermarriage, JUST ALLOWING NEGROES INTO THE WHITE CHURCHES IS DISOBEDIENCE TO GOD! Do you say, “I didn’t see that in my Bible?” That is only because mis-translation has concealed it from you. No doubt you are puzzled when you read the following:

deuteronomy 23:2, “A bastard shall not enter into the Congregation of the Lord: even to the tenth generation shall he not enter into the Congregation of the Lord.”

You wondered at this because an illegitimate child is not to blame for the sins of its parents; and why should be penalty extend for ten generations? They might all be legitimately born. But the Hebrew word mis-translated “bastard” is the word “MAMZER” which truly means a MIXTURE, A HALFBREED or MONGREL. It has nothing to do with whether or not the child’s parents were married. It refers to the FORBIDDEN INTERMIXTURE OF THE RACES. That is why the penalty extends for TEN GENERATIONS and it shows how seriously God treats this sin. It is true that a mulatto child is not to blame for his parents BUT HE IS STILL A MULATTO! The first generation would be a half-breed; the second would have a least a quarter of the dark blood; the third at least one-eighth; the fourth, one sixteenth and so on. IN THE TENTH GENERATION the Negro blood may be as small as one part in 1,024 - yet God Himself says that this is too much to be allowed to enter into the Congregation of the Lord.

If you admit that your church is not worthy to be called “The Congregation of the Lord” then perhaps this doesn’t concern you. But if your church is trying to be “the Congregation of the Lord”, hadn’t you better obey God’s own commandment concerning it? Call this to the attention of your Minister.

The unfortunate children of such marriages are not the guilty ones, of course. The sin is that of the parents. Yet the fact that they cannot help what they are, does not change the permanent fact that THEY ARE WHAT THEY ARE! The experience of thousands of years has demonstrated that the dark races do not have what it takes to produce the White man’s high civilization. They have never had it in their own lands and they only have it here because the white race has made it so. The mixed breed is the same. It does not have, in proper measure, those qualities which god so carefully implanted in the white race to carry out certain purposes which He has assigned to them. Recognition that God Himself, made the races different, does not imply hatred or contempt for any of them. Difference has its purpose, which must be respected. One does not expect the family cat to sing like the canary, nor the canary to keep mice out of the kitchen. If one went Quail hunting he would not expect the horse to point Quail for him. Neither would one try to saddle and ride the best hunting dog in the world. All of the family pets are equally loved, and neither is despised because he can’t do what some other does. Each has its own purpose, and trying to mix them up or interbreed them can only bring harm to them.

There are many people to whom these facts are new. There are also many who have learned the evil lesson that they can get more money or more political popularity by violating these laws of God than by obeying them. Some may not like to be reminded of these things. But remember, the Bible is written by God through His prophets and His commandments are always right.

FOR OUR OWN GOOD - FOR THE VERY SURVIVAL OF OUR WHITE RACE UPON THE EARTH - AND THAT WE MAY FACE OUR GOD WITH A CLEAR CONSCIENCE - WE HAD BETTER OBEY THESE LAWS OF GOD!

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

West Coast radio listeners hear Atty. Bertrand L. Comparet on KTYM - 1460 Kc. Monday thru Friday at 11:15 A.M. Correspondence will reach him at P.O. Box 2431, San Diego, California.

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

DISCIPLES OF THE DEVIL

By Col. Ben Cameron

 

 

We have in our possession a booklet entitled “Freedom From War - The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament In A Peaceful World.” This booklet is an exact reproduction of State Department Publication No. 7277 except for the notice that it is an exact reproduction and the elimination of four unnecessary blank pages. It states that it is a Department of State (U.S.Ed) Publication 7277, Disarmament Series 5, released September 1961, Office of Public Services, Bureau of Public Affairs.

In the introduction, this document says that “…the United States has introduced at the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations, a Program for General and Complete Disarmament In A Peaceful World.” Also in the introduction it continues……”This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace.”

Following the Introduction, this document says: “First there must be immediate disarmament action: A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.”

The document continues: “Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls: The Control Organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.”

The document continues: “Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established: There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”

The document continues: “There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament In A Peaceful World. The full text of the new program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.”

“FREEDOM FROM WAR - The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. SUMMARY - DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES. The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.”

“In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts: The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force; the elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;”

The document continues: ”The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; the establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.”

After reading the above program, we ask these questions:

1. Where, in the CONSTITUTION OF THESE UNITED STATES, has any branch, agency or individual of the federal government been given the power to DISARM these United States for any reason whatsoever?

2. Where does the CONSTITUTION give anyone the power to strengthen INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS for any reason whatsoever?

3. Where does the CONSTITUTION give any the power to make any agreements with any INTERNATIONAL body of any kind for the DISARMAMENT of these United States?

4. Where does the CONSTITUTION give anyone the power to support any INTERNATIONAL institution under the United Nations or any other “International Body” by any name whatsoever and to create any kind of INTERNATIONAL PEACE FORCE of any kind whatsoever?

5. Where does the CONSTITUTION give anyone the power to involve the States of this Union in any disarmament under “effective INTERNATIONAL control” in accordance with any principles of any INTERNATIONAL organization of any kind whatsoever?

6. Where does the CONSTITUTION give anyone the power to DISBAND THE ARMED FORCES OF THESE UNITED STATES AND TO PROHIBIT THEIR REESTABLISHMENT in whatever form necessary for the defense of these United States - OR TO DELIVER ANY PART OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO ANY INTERNATIONAL BODY of any kind whatsoever for any purpose?

7. Where does the CONSTITUTION give anyone the power to ELIMINATE ANY OR ALL of our ARMAMENTS to include weapons of mass destruction AND THE MEANS FOR THEIR DELIVERY?

8. Where does the CONSTITUTION give anyone the power to maintain peace with any nation or tribe that threatens the security of the States of this Union, or to establish any “International” organization for disarmament of these United States for any reason whatsoever, or to insure compliance by the States of this Union with any INTERNATIONAL government of any kind whatsoever?

THE ANSWER TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS IS CLEAR! NO POWER EXISTS FOR SUCH ACTIONS! THE PERSONS WHO PREPARED SUCH GARBAGE SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TEASON AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATES OF THIS UNION! Is YOUR State in the Union? Then WHY does your GOVERNOR and your State Legislature permit these ACTS OF TREASON to go UNCHALLENGED?

The CONGRESS (House of Representatives) has the power to BRING THE CHARGE (Impeach) any and all officials of the federal government for any crime whatsoever - and the violation of the oath of office to UPHOLD, PRESERVE AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THESE UNITED STATES IS A CRIMINAL ACT!

If telling your congressman is ineffective and a waste of time, then proceed to your STATE governments, demanding they take action on this matter.

The treasonous material we have quoted herein was released in 1961 - and you have seen it being implemented since then. The plan was written and the plan has been, and is being implemented!

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

ezra, chapter 9, vs. 12: “Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, NOR SEEK THEIR PEACE or their wealth forever: that YE MAY BE STRONG and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children forever.”

BIBLE READING: isaiah 57:21 daniel 8:25 ezekiel 7:23-25; 13:1-16

matthew 10:32-34 jeremiah 6:14; 8:11-15

 

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

 

 

 

---

 

THE CHURCH MILITANT

AND

THE JEWS

 

 

The following material is extracted from a Catholic Monthly “The Point” published in Cambridge, Mass. The date - October 1956. We are extracting because we do not have the space here to reprint the entire pamphlet - put present it as an item of interest to Christians of all denominations……QUOTE:

Some Front-line Reports - late last month, Harvard University settled down to its academic year number three hundred and twenty. Although statistics are not yet available on the student body, we have it from an exceptionally reliable source that the University’s faculty is still more than fifty percent Gentile.

This measured majority of non-Jewish instructors however, is in no sense calculated to make the Jewish student uneasy - nor does it. For all of Harvard’s Gentile faculty members are well-schooled and long-practiced in giving their annual courses the anti-Christian, and thus inevitably Jewish slant.

One such Harvard Gentile is Doctor Gordon Allport, professor of psychology, champion of UNESCO and pride of the University’s recent and bulging Social Regulations Department. Among Doctor Allport’s more eloquent class-room lectures is the one which deals with the “anti-Semitism of the Saints.” In 1954, he incorporated this material in his book, “The Nature of Prejudice”, and got Paul Blanshard’s publisher to distribute it for him.

At the risk of minor scandal, we shall be bold enough to say that in one aspect of his argument, Doctor Allport is not entirely wrong. He points out that it is in no sense exceptional with the Catholic Church’s Saints to “slip from piety into prejudice.” Since by prejudice Doctor Allport here means anti-Jewishness, we are bound to agree.

In fact we have determined to illustrate the matter at some length this month, with pertinent stories and quotes from our files. The miscellaneous items which now follow, expanding the theme of “our anti-Jewish Saints”, may reveal even to Doctor Allport the enormity of the truth which however clumsily, - he managed to stumble upon.

The most exalted of the Church’s Saints are, of course, her martyrs. And the very first martyr, as every parochial school student knows, was the deacon Saint Stephen.

After hearing Stephen’s denunciation of the Jews in Chapter Seven of the Acts of the Apostles, and after seeing the vengeful Jews stone him to death in the same chapter, a Catholic child is hardly surprised to learn that the chief of the Apostles, Saint Peter, was constantly preaching against the Jews, reprimanding them for killing Our Lord and that Saint Paul, who gloried in his title “The Apostle to the Gentiles”, complained in his first Epistle to the Thessalonians that the Jews “both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men; prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the end.”

Similarly, Saint John, Our Lord’s favorite Apostle refers to the Jews as those “that say they are Jews (Judeans - Ed) and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan” - a statement which echoes the words of Our Lord Himself who in Saint John’s Gospel, tells the Jews they are the children of the devil.

Knowing that such precedents have been set by the Church’s very first Saints, Catholic children (and those who have become as little Catholic children) are prepared for what follows: the example of canonized Catholics, all down the Christian centuries, whose lives further illustrate, with an overwhelming variety of detail, that Saints and Jews just don’t mix!

California’s mission church of San Juan Capistrano, dear to American folklore as a romantic haven to which the swallows annually and melodiously come back - is dedicated to a fifteenth century Franciscan friar known during his life and since as “the scourge of the Jews.”

How Saint John Capistran came by his admiring title is a record of fiery sermons, assiduous labors and incidental remarks - for instance, his unfollowed but unforgotten suggestion to the city of Rome that it round up all its Jews, herd them aboard ships, and deport them overseas.

When a Sacred Host was desecrated in the Polish city of Breslau, Saint John Capistran persuaded the King of Poland to revoke the pro-Jewish ordinances he had allowed and to order all Jews in Breslau imprisoned until the culprits are identified. Ultimately, 58 Jews were found guilty of the Host desecration and executed; whereupon the local rabbi hanged himself.

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (a work concocted at the expense of the U.S. Government, as a project of the W.P.A.) pays a tribute to Saint John Capistran’s efforts by including him in its select list of the greatest anti-Semites of all time.

The teachings and preachings of Saint Ambrose fourth century Bishop of Milan, have so impressed the Church with their holy brilliance that he has been long designated one of the four Great Latin Doctors.

Among the utterances of this most learned teacher there are, not surprisingly, some stringent words concerning the Jews. “The very conversation with them is a great pollution” is one of the Ambrosian aphorisms.

Once, in a sermon at Milan, Saint Ambrose thundered so mightily against the synagogue, calling it “a house of impiety, a receptacle of folly which God Himself has condemned,” that his Milanese parishioners, on leaving the Cathedral, hurried over to the nearest Jewish temple and burned it to the ground.

When the delegation of the city’s Jews and their friends protested the deed to Saint Ambrose, he brought them up short with the following notice: “I declare that I set fire to the synagogue, or at least that I ordered those that did it that there might not be a place where Christ was denied. If it be objected to me that I did not actually set the synagogue on fire here, I answer that it began to be burnt by the judgment of God.”

On another occasion, when the Emperor Theodosius ordered a Bishop in the East to pay for the rebuilding of a demolished synagogue, Saint Ambrose, seeing Theodosius present in his Cathedral, refused to start mass until the Emperor had promised to rescind the order.

If any of our current candidates for public office would like to know what qualities the Church thinks a ruler should have, he will find them exemplified in the canonized king for whom the city of Saint Louis, Missouri, is named.

Ruling France from 1226 to 1270, King Louis IX stood as a beacon in the brightest of all Catholic centuries. The wisdom and justice of his public acts, together with his personal valor and devotion (He led the armies of the last two Crusades) are the legacy and legend of his country.

In his solicitude for both the earthly and eternal welfare of his subjects, Saint Louis was, of course, a confirmed enemy of the Jews. His first recorded act against them was a decree, in 1230, prohibiting Jewish usurers from pursuing their lucrative occupation. Later he followed this up by prescribing that all French Christians who were indebted to Jews should slice one-third from the amount owed.

In June of 1242, Saint Louis set the style for other Catholic monarchs by ordering, at Paris, Europe’s first official public burning of the Talmud. Additional copies of the Jewish book were confiscated and burned by order of the King in 1244 and in 1248.

Even more blazingly expressive than his Talmud-fueled fires, however, is Saint Louis’ forthright advice to the laity of France regarding disputations with Jews: “I say to you,” he told them, “that no one, unless he be a very good cleric, should argue with them; but the layman, when he heareth the Christian law reviled, should not defend it but by his sword, wherewith he should pierce the body of the reviler as far as it will go.”

The Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help in Boston, the Church of the Holy Redeemer in Detroit and Saint Alphonsus Church in New Orleans are three of the more than one hundred beautiful churches throughout the country which are staffed by the priests of the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer. These Redemptorist Fathers, as they are popularly called, belong to an order which was founded in Italy in the eighteenth century by an Italian Bishop and Doctor of the Church, Saint Alphonsus Maria de Liguori. And to the embarrassment of the more liberal Redemptorists, Saint Alphonsus Maria is true to traditional form on the question of the Jews.

In previous issues, we have cited Saint Alphonsus’ prohibitions against Catholic patronage of Jewish physicians, and against Catholic support of Jewish candidates for public office. But like all the Church’s official theologians, Saint Alphonsus lashes out against the Jews for that supernatural, New Testament reason: their betrayal and crucifixion of Our Lord. The Saint treats extensively on this betrayal in his book, “The Passion and Death of Jesus Christ,” and we quote the following passage from page 198 of Father Eugene Grimm’s authorized translation, bearing the Imprimatur of the late Cardinal Hayes, Archbishop of New York.

“Saint Luke says that Pilate delivered Jesus into the hands of the Jews that they might treat Him as they pleased Jesus was delivered up to their will. (Luke xxiii, 25). This is what really happens when an innocent man is condemned. He is given over to the hands of his enemies, that they may take away his life by the death which is most pleasing to them. Unhappy Jews! You then said, ‘His blood be upon us and upon our children.’ (Matthew xxvii, 25). You have prayed for the chastisement; it has already come. Your nation bears, and shall bear to the end of the world, the punishment due to the shedding of that innocent blood!”

“Marrano” is a Spanish word meaning swine. It is also a word used to identify that familiar figure of the Spanish Middle Ages; The Jew who had held his head over a Baptismal font as was pretending to be a Christian while remaining at heart a dedicated enemy of Jesus Christ.

So many were there of this breed, that during the early fifteenth century the professedly Jewish population of Spain dwindled from 5,000,000 members to 200,000. Except for the handful who were genuinely converted, the bulk of the four million odd missing Jews had become Marranos. In the guise of Catholics they crowded into, and crowded Gentiles out of every phase of Spanish life. Not only were they the merchants and money-lenders of the country, its lawyers and physicians and apothecaries, they had finally come to dominate the royal court. Even the Church was beginning to buckle under the influence they exerted as monks, as priests, and, in ever increasing numbers as bishops.

Inevitably, Christian Spain awoke to the stark realization that the “converted Jews” in their midst had not been converted at all; that, indeed, they still hated the Catholic Church with the congenital fury of their race and longed to see her devastated - a work they were now terrifyingly equipped to accomplish.

In 1478, Queen Isabella of Spain (the same who later sent Columbus on his voyage to the New World) shaking off her Jewish councilors, petitioned Pope Sixtus IV to authorize the establishment of an Inquisition for the purpose of exposing secret Jews. The effectiveness of this Spanish Inquisition may be gauged by the frenzy with which the Jews have been denouncing it ever since.

Though the anti-Jewish Queen Isabella (who was eventually obliged, in 1492, to expel all Jews from Spain) has not been canonized, one of the first Inquisitors has been. He is Saint Peter Arbues, and so notably well did he do his job of finding and foiling the Marranos that they murdered him. A few weeks ago, on September 17, Catholic religeous all over the world heard this commemoration read from the Roman Martyrology: “At Saragossa in Spain, of Saint Peter Arbues, first Inquisitor of the Faith in the Kingdom of Aragon, who was cruelly butchered by relapse Jews for the sake of that Catholic Faith which he has so zealously protected by virtue of his office, Pope Pius IX added him to the list of martyr Saints.”

Four hundred years before the brutal attacks on Saint Peter Arbues, another Saint, Pope Gregory VII had been forced into action against the Jews of Spain. In 1081, Saint Gregory wrote to King Alphonso VI of Castile, “You must cease to allow Jews to rule over Christians …… For to allow Christians to be subordinate to Jews, and to be subject to their judgment, is the same as to oppress God’s Church and to exalt the Synagogue of Satan. To wish to please the enemies of Christ means to treat Christ Himself with contempt.”

We neglected to say at the outset of this issue that when Harvard’s Doctor Allport was looking around for a particular Saint to illustrate his “piety and prejudice” theme, he chose that giant among the Church’s theologians, Saint John Chrysostom. Ever since the early fifth century, John Chrysostom has been a name to terrorize the very boldest Jew in the ghetto. The Jewish Encyclopedia includes a special article on him, accusing him among so many other things, of saying that the “holy ark” which Jews now have in their synagogue is “no better than any wooden box offered for sale in the market.”

The quotation from Saint Chrysostom which doctor Allport selected for his book is a more famous one. It is taken from the Saint’s Six Homilies Against the Jews, as found in Migne’s Greet Patrology.

From this work we reprint the passage on “the synagogue”, a striking summary of the Catholic position and a fitting conclusion for our miscellany of “holy bigotry.”

“The synagogue is worse than a brothel…it is the den of scoundrels, and the repair of wild beasts, the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults…a place of meeting for the assassins of Christ…a den of thieves, a house of ill fame, a dwelling of iniquity, a refuge of devils, a gulf and abyss of perdition…Whatever name even more horrible could be found will never be worse than the synagogue deserves.”

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

Although we have no proof, we have heard many small rumors that the Catholic Priests who published the above material were subsequently harassed and all but ex-communicated by the hierarchy of the Church. In short, they were “silenced”. But were they?

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

THE NEGROES 23^RD PSALM

Lyndon is my Shepherd, I shall not work - He maketh me to lie down in front of theaters

He leadeth me into white universities - He restoreth my welfare checks

He leadeth me into the paths of sit-ins for - communion sake - Yea, though I walk through

the heart of Dixie, I shall fear no police, - For Lyndon is with me,

His tear gas and federal troops, they comfort me, - He prepareth a table for me in the presence of white folk - He anointeth my head with anti-kink straightener - My Cadillac tank runneth over,

Surely, the Supreme Court will follow me all the days of my life and I shall dwell in the Federal Housing Projects forever.

 

 

---

 

 

THE ANTI-CHRIST UNITED NATIONS

 

 

Whether or not one is sympathetic to the K.K.K. is not the question here. Most Christian patriots see the benefits of the House Committee on UnAmerican Activities and have supported that Committee along with its objectives. Can it be that the Congress of the United States and its House Committee on UnAmerican Activities is being used to implement the anti-white, anti-Christian program of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL United Nations Organization? Let us look at some evidence:

United Nations General Assembly Resolution No. 1904 has been published in pamphlet form by the United Nations Office of Public Information (OPI/151-63-27884, January 1964-100M, 11082-May, 1964-50M) and amongst many other anti-white, anti-Christian unconstitutional provisions, it contains Article 9, which reads as follows:

1. All propaganda and organizations based on ideas or theories of the superiority of one race or group of persons of one color or ethnic origin with a view to justifying or promoting racial discrimination in any form shall be severely condemned.

2. All incitement to or acts of violence, whether by individuals or organizations, against any race or group of persons of another color or ethnic origin shall be considered an offense against society and punishable under law.

3. In order to put into effect the purposes and principles of the present declaration, all States shall take immediate and positive measures, including legislative and other measures, to prosecute and/or outlaw organizations which promote or incite to racial discrimination, or incite to or use violence for purposes of discrimination based on race, color or ethnic origin.

A letter to a very prominent patriot reveals that this United Nations General Assembly Resolution is responsible for the investigation of the K.K.K. The United States government, according to the beliefs of anti-Christ forces, must enact legislation which will outlaw certain organizations - and the recent investigation of the K.K.K. is for the purpose of finding a reason for such a law.

There are more than 2,000 of these United Nations General Assembly Resolutions. These, according to the anti-Christ United Nations, ARE THE LAW OF THE WORLD! It seems that both the U.N. and certain officials of “our” government take literally the provisions of Article 25 of the U.N. Charter, i.e. “Member Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council.” Later, the General Assembly adopted the “Uniting for Peace” resolution conferring upon themselves all powers placed by the Charter with the Security Council - so now we are supposed to accept and carry out the decisions of the General Assembly AND the Security Council. The Security Council does not make many decisions - for that is where the VETO lies.

One of the most strange performances on record is the situation of Rhodesia. The Charter, so says the U.N., obliges the colonial powers to give up their colonies and to help those colonies establish governments based upon “Equal Suffrage” (Gen. Assy. Res. No. 1514). Rhodesia was a colony of Great Britain and Rhodesia jumped the gun and declared her independence in 1961. England, knowing she would have to free this colony anyway, decided to let her go - and helped set up a government. Then the United Nations got into the act, commanding Rhodesia to rescind her Constitution, claiming that the government was not based upon “equal suffrage.” Rhodesia refused, so another U.N. Resolution commanded England to TAKE BACK this colony and hold it in trust until such time as a new Constitution, based upon the principle of “one man - one vote” had been established. The words “one man - one vote” did not appear in the Resolution No. 1514, but in the two succeeding Resolutions, No. 1514 was interpreted as meaning “one man - one vote”. This is where the U.S. Supreme Court received its directions for the re-apportionment decision. They are implementing this United Nations General Assembly Resolution!

England refused to interfere with Rhodesia, saying that so far as she was concerned, Rhodesia was free and independent. Therefore another United Nations Resolution renewed the demand but when Britain held firm, a fifth Resolution invoked sanctions against Britain, commanding all member nations to apply whatever pressures that were available against England. Then Britain caved in but Rhodesia held out. Now, another United nations General Assembly Resolution commands Britain to bring Rhodesia to heel even if it requires military force. South Africa has been supporting Rhodesia and will most probably continue to do so. Then the United Nations will demand that Britain (and probably the United States) fight a UNITED NATIONS WAR against south Africa and to pay for it as well. (See the Carnegie War Plan which was recently exposed).

With the above analysis in mind, it seems well to ask this question: Are the members of the House Committee on UnAmerican Activities acting under the powers granted by the U.S. CONSTITUTION in their so-called investigation of the Ku Klux Klan - or are they acting under the UNCONSTITUTIONAL directions of the above Article 9 of United Nations General Assembly Resolution No. 1904 ????

It might also be appropriate to mention that any official of the United States who violates his oath of office TO UPHOLD, PRESERVE AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, commits a crime (felony). The time may be close at hand when such officials must be held to answer for any such criminal acts. THE LAW OF THE GOD OF THIS CHRISTIAN NATION - JESUS CHRIST - PROHIBITS ONE of HIS PEOPLE FROM WAR AGAINST HIS PEOPLE - the anti-Christ UNITED NATIONS must be held to answer. We repeat - get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the United States! Before it is too late!

 

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

 

---

 

 

THE COUNCIL FOR STATEHOOD

 

 

 

We recommend that all readers of IDENTITY support the COUNCIL FOR STATEHOOD, P.O. 1131, North Miami, Florida 33161/

It is appropriate to reprint a brief of their Dec. 1966 memorandum entitled “Will Black October produce another U.N. War?” It is as follows:

The United Nations is going to war in Southern Africa. On October 28, the General Assembly of the U.N. voted for the ruling by the U.N. World court that South Africa legally held the mandate over South West Africa. The invasion and conquest of south West Africa will require a tremendous military force. The U.N. has no army of its own BUT it has been given the authority to call up all, or any part, of the armed forces of a “Member Nation”. As a member nation, the United States is considered firmly bound by TREATY AGREEMENT under Article 43 of the U.N. Charter, to “make available to the Security Council ON ITS CALL and in accordance with…a special agreement, ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES.

OCTOBER 7^th: The President and Secretary of State conferred privately with U. Thant, Arthur Goldberg and Ralph Bunche in United Nations headquarters in New York. Did they negotiate the “Special Agreement” necessary to transfer U.S. Armed Forces to the U.N. for war in Africa? Subsequent events indicate that THEY DID!

OCTOBER 8^th: Congress enacted legislation permitting the President to call up nearly two million reservists without declaring a “National” emergency. (A U.N. war is an “international” emergency).

OCTOBER 13^th: The President signed an Executive Order (#11310) conferring wartime emergency powers upon the Attorney General.

OCTOBER 21^st: Senator Richard e. Russell, chairman of the Armed Service committee washed his, and the Senate’s ands of responsibility for preventing the up-coming African war with U.S. troops by expressing the HOPE that the United Nations will not use United States forces - BUT he says he “fears the worst.” - Senator Russell knows and acknowledges what has been so skillfully concealed from American parents - that congress has UNCONSTITUTIONALLY abdicated all control over, and responsibility for our Armed Forces. Congress authorizes the training and the financing of the Armed Forces which may be sent UNCONSTITUTIONALLY to war only by and under the authority of the Security Council of the United Nations. (Art. 25, 33, 39, 43, 53, 54). The Senate of the United States, by UNCONSTITUTIONAL Treaty Commitment, has agreed UNCONSTITUTIONALLY to let the U.N. decide for us when, where, why, and how our Armed Forces are sent to war, and it has UNCONSTITUTIONALLY agreed in advance that the “Security council acts in its (our) behalf.”

At this moment the entire Armed Services of the Untied States, those in training, all reservists, and including the men in Viet Nam are by UNCONSTITUTIONAL treaty agreement, subject to call by the Security Council at any time to fight the war in Africa; a war which is not for the sole purpose of taking over South West Africa, but for bringing down the WHITE CHRISTIAN GOVERNMENTS of South Africa, Rhodesia, Portuguese Angola and Mozambique.

OCTOBER 28^th: The U.N. General Assembly voted to take over South West Africa. Now they must raise an army to do it. The UNCONSTITUTIONAL United States Ambassador and the President have guaranteed the full support of the United States for any U.N. action in Africa.

OCTOBER 21^st: A U.N. Committee of 14 members was appointed to work out the details of the invasion ad report back to the General Assembly not later than APRIL, 1967.

(We have added the UNCONSTITUTIONAL in the above). TREASON IS WITHIN OUR GATES! Jesus come quickly ! ! !

 

 

---

 

LINCOLN’S HOPE FOR THE NEGRO

IN

HIS OWN WORDS

 

“What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races.”

(Spoken at Springfield, Illinois, July 17, 1858). Abraham Lincoln Complete Works, edited by Nicolay and Hay, Published by the Century Company, 1891, volume I, page 273.

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

“I will say then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races- that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, - nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which will ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

(Spoken in sixth joint debate with Senator Douglas at Quincy, Illinois, October 13, 1858), Abraham Lincoln Complete Works, edited by Nicolay and Hay, The Century Company, 1894, pages 369, 370, 457 and 458; also at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858, in fourth debate with Douglas.)

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

“Why should the people of your race be colonized and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly,. Many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word we suffer on each side. If this be admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated. It is better for both, therefore, to be separated.”

(Spoken to a committee of colored men at the White House, July 14, 1862). The New York Daily Tribune August 15, 1862, page 1; New York Semi-Weekly Times August 15, 1862, Page 5.

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

It seems that Abraham Lincoln knew more of his Bible than most present day clergymen. He knew that it is the word of god to His people. It has nothing to do with Church and Religion per se but contains God’s LAWS for His people and their GOVERNMENT! Lincoln also knew that the Bible is the Book of the race of Adam (Adamic or White Race). See Genesis 5:1. In Genesis 7:1-6 notice that there are people on the earth who are ABOVE all other people. This is WHITE SUPREMACY direct from the mouth of God!

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

 

IMPORTANT SCRIPTURE READING

 

Deuteronomy 6:4 John 8:39-47

Isaiah 48:12 John 8:47

John 14:8-9 John 8:39

Matthew 15:24 Matthew 13:35-39

Galatians 3:29 John 10:26-30

I John 3:12 John 7:70-71

Matthew 23:34 2 Chronicles 7:14

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§

 

 

ITEMS TO REMEMBER

 

The CONSTITUTION is a CONTRACT by and between the STATES of the Union.

The STATES are the parties to the contract and the federal government is merely an AGENT of the STATES.

The Articles of Confederation provide for a COMMITTEE OF THE STATES. The Committee of the States may REPLACE the federal Congress if it fails to perform its obligations to the CONSTITUTION (contract).

The Committee of the States may declare its delegates exempt from arrest or confinement and may arrest and confine any person whomsoever if that person interferes with the duties of the Committee.

Joining the United Nations, by the federal government, has been a USURPATION of power NOT GRANTED by the STATES in the contract known as the Constitution, and in so doing, the federal government has, in effect destroyed itself by surrendering its functions to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL World Government.

Every STATE, either by an Executive Order of its Governor or an Act of its LEGISLATURE, should abide by its contract with the other States and REPUDIATE all UNLAWFUL acts of the federal government AND WITHDRAW the STATE from the UNITED NATIONS! It is not only the DUTY of the States but it is their solemn OBLIGATION.

No branch of the federal government, alone or in union with the other branches, may alter or amend the contract between the States (the CONSTITUTION). It may only be amended by a vote of three-fourths of the States, who are the parties to the contract. Therefore, all acts of the federal government which pertain to the United Nations and its establishment, are IN VIOLATION of the Constitution, they are UNLAWFUL “ultra vires” and of no legal effect.

A Military Officer of the United States is under oath ONLY to uphold, preserve and defend THE CONSTITUTION.

 

 

 

---

 

A MESSAGE TO THOSE WHO WEAKEN

AND SUBMIT TO ANTI-CHRIST

 

 

From the Gospel of Bartholomew, Chapter V:

Bartholomew saith unto Him: Declare unto us Lord Jesus, what sin is heavier than all sins? Jesus saith unto him: “Verily I say unto thee that hypocrisy and backbiting is heavier than all sins: for because of them, the prophet said in the psalm that the ungodly shall not rise in the judgment, neither sinners in the council of the righteous, neither the ungodly in the judgment of My Father. Verily, verily, I say unto you, that every sin shall be forgiven unto every man, but the sin against the Holy ghost shall not be forgiven.”

And Bartholomew saith unto Him: “What is the sin against the Holy Ghost?” Jesus saith unto him: “Whosoever shall decree against any man that hath served My Holy Father hath blasphemed against the Holy Ghost, for every man that serveth God worshipfully is worthy of the Holy Ghost, and he that speaketh evil against him shall not be forgiven.”

 

 

 

---

 

 

ORDER NOW

FROM

THE COUNCIL FOR STATEHOOD

 

The Judge’s Letter

House Resolution 130

Mary Davison’s Letter

Single Set - 10¢ 25 Sets - $1.50

10 Sets - 80¢ 75 Sets - $2.25

FIFTY Congressmen have led off with a RESOLUTION, calling upon the Administration to TURN OVER THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE UNITED NATIONS NOW! This is supposed to smooth the way for use of United States Armed Forces in a war - against the white, Christians of South Africa. Get the names of these Congressmen from the Council of Statehood, P.O. Box 1131, North Miami, Florida, 33161.

 

 

 

---

 

 

SCRIPTURE

 

 

“Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God is ONE Lord.”

“Harken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, My called; I am He; I am the first, I also am the last.”

“So will I make My Holy Name known in the midst of My people Israel………”

“Philip saith unto Him, Lord, show us the Father and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, have I been so long a time with you and yet hast thou not known Me Philip? He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, show us the Father?”

“But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel.”

“And if ye be Christ’s (Christian), then are ye Abraham’s seed (Israel) and heirs according to the promise.”

“If My people, which are called by My Name shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will heal their land.”

 

 

---

 

THE TRIBES OF ISRAEL

WHICH BECAME NATIONS

 

 

Simeon - Spain Ishacaar - Finland

Napthali - Norway Dan - Denmark

Zebulun - France Ephraim - Great Britain

Asher - Sweden Manasseh - U.S.A.

Gad - Italy Judah - Germany

Reuben - Holland Benjamin - Iceland

 

The Great Seal of the United States is the Seal of Manasseh - according to the records of Congress!

 

 

 

 

 

 

I AM THE GOOD SHEPHERD, AND KNOW MY SHEEP: AND AM KNOWN OF MINE! JOHN 10 : 14