VOL 7 NO 6 - 2/75 - Highlights: Reprint Of Mid East Crisis Issue by Col. Ben Cameron with various additional reprint articles

I D E N T I T Y

A CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUBLICATION

MIDDLE EAST CRISIS

REPRINT

Volume 7, No. 6

February 1975

Published Quarterly by the Ministry of Christ Church

4955 Sierra Pines Dr.

Mariposa, CA 95338


MIDDLE EAST CRISIS

By Col. Ben Cameron

Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures” saith Yaveh God who is Jesus Christ, the Alpha and the Omega. (Matt. 22:29)

The Arab leaders believe that the United States of America is pro-Jew - and they have good reason to believe this. There seems to be no doubt that anti-Christ forces direct the foreign policy as well as the internal domestic policies of this nation. They do not accomplish this by the electoral process completely but they do obtain results just as though they were the rulers of this nation. And they are…but from behind the scenes. Why?

As for My people, children are their oppressors and women rule over them. O My people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” (Isaiah 3:12)

For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed.” (Isaiah 9:16)

For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Nations be come in.” (Romans 11:25)

Hear O heavens, and give ear, O earth; for Yaveh (Jesus) has spoken, I have nourished and brought up children and they have rebelled against Me……the ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master’s crib; but Israel does no know, My people do not consider.” (Isaiah 1:2-3)

ISRAELITES (CHRISTIANS) DO NOT KNOW THEIR TRUE IDENTITY! THEY ARE HELPING THE ENEMIES OF JESUS ! ! !

Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers (non-whites and Jews) devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers.” (Isaiah 1:7)

Since it is quite true and also in accord with Bible prophecy that our government would be taken over by strangers and that our nation would be in this trouble that we are in - let us also look to history and the background of the Bolshevik revolution. There is no need to go into all of the details here, but simply to hit the highlights. Documented events make it clear that the Bolshevik revolution in Russia was a complete Jew-controlled and Jew-financed revolution. Czar Nicholas II was a Christian of Germanic (Judah) stock. What people today fail to understand is that the Soviet Union is a completely Jew-dominated government. Any reasonable research into the background of the Soviet Union and the true names of the Communist leadership world-wide, proves that it is Jewish from top to bottom. Oh yes, there are many non-Jews who are dupes and proselytes to give the appearance of a non-Jew front. But the fact remains - Communism is a “front” for anti-Christ Judaism all over the world. World Jewry with its control of the mass media of communication have done a wonderful “snow job” with propaganda that attempts to whitewash the Jews from Communism of the Soviet Union. They accomplish this by the propaganda that the Soviet Union is anti-Semitic and against the Jews, when in reality it is against the law and the Soviet Constitution to be anti-Jew in the Soviet Union. Christian leaders as well as the general populations of Christian nations are constantly bombarded with this phony Jew propaganda. On the other hand, the most despicable conditions exist in the organized Churches and religious institutions, not only in the United States but in all the world. The Clergy have profaned the Word of Jesus Christ and the Gospel by teaching Jewish “fables”.

For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision; whose mouths must be stopped who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies, this witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men that turn from the truth.” (Titus 1:10-14)

The most prolific Jewish FABLE that has ever been preached in this world is that the Jews are the Israelites of the Bible and that Jesus Christ is a Jew. When challenged on this matter, those who make such a false claim cannot show where the Bible says such garbage. The most surprising fact is that CHRISTIANS believe the FABLE without question - yet when the truth is told, they rise up in anger and begin the name-calling. It is time for this nonsense to stop. It is time for the Clergy to teach truth and it is far past the time for the leaders of our government to be faced with the facts. One might ask at this point, “What does this have to do with the Middle East?” It has EVERYTHING to do with the Middle East! It has been this JEWISH FABLE that has influenced the foreign policy of Christian nations and their governments for many years. It is this same JEWISH FABLE that is influencing the leaders of this nation and its Mid-East policies today. It was this same JEWISH FABLE that deceived the government and leaders of the British Empire into permitting organized World Jewry to employ the Jewish Balfour Declaration for the purpose of laying a false claim to the Holy Land. There is no doubt that the Holy Land is the property of the Israelite people of the Bible. In fact, Jeremiah the prophet took the title Deed on that land to the Isles of Britain where it should be in the possession of the Church archives today (unless the anti-Christ has stolen it). It is of utmost importance to learn the true IDENTITY of the lawful heirs to that land! If the Jews are the true Israelites of the Bible, then it would make Jesus Christ a liar and all Christianity false and of no effect. In order to determine the truth in this matter, there is no other source than the Holy Scripture. So we turn to the source of truth. Let us start at the beginning.

The first Book of the Bible called Genesis: Chapter 1 is a mere synopsis covering ages or eons of time. Time is the measurement of distance between events that have been recorded in history. The first Chapter of Genesis tells us that God created the entire universe including this planet “earth”. It also tells us that He created PEOPLE. The “man” (Heb. Enosh) referred to in this chapter is a CREATED being. Chapter 2 confirms the fact that PEOPLE were created and in verse 4 it is clear that “races” of people were CREATED. The English word “generation” means “race.” In short, after all of the races were created that are referred to in Chapter 1 and the first few verses of Chapter 2, and after God had rested from all of His CREATIONS, there was NOT A MAN (ADAM) to till the ground. (See Ch. 2, Vs 5). The Bible then brings in ADAM and EVE who were NOT of the CREATIONS but who were “formed” into flesh bodies here on the earth (terrestrial planes). The Bible does indicate a difference between the “created” races and the race of Adam and Eve. The created races are referred to as male and female while Adam and Eve are referred to as Man and Woman. In Verse 23 of Chapter 2 the Bible Notes for Adam and Eve are the Hebrew words “Ish” and “Isha”. The word “Ish” is the masculine and “Isha” the feminine and the meaning is “issue” or “progeny.” For Adam the English word would be “son” and for Eve the English word would be “daughter.” Let us now turn to the New Testament, Luke 3:38: “Which was the son (Ish) of Enos, which was the son (Ish) of Seth, which was the son (Ish) of Adam, which was the son (Ish) of GOD.” The Bible says that ADAM was the SON OF GOD! At this point one might wonder, “What does this have to do with the Middle East situation of today?” It has EVERYTHING to do with it! Read on and see.

Chapter 5, Verse 1 of Genesis: “This is the Book of the generations(race) of Adam.” Please note that translators have made a literal mess out of Verse 2, confusing the “male and female” created with the “man and woman” begotten race.

At this point n chronology we turn to the Book of Revelation. Chapter 12 should be read over and over until it is properly understood. In short, Satan the devil was placed upon this planet earth along with certain of his angels. We now return to Genesis, Chapter 3, Verse 15. God put enmity between the seed (descendants) of Adam and Eve (Children of God) and the seed (descendants) of Satan (Children of Satan).

The Middle East situation is the culmination of that enmity and the war between the children of God and the children of Satan here on this earth!

The word Is-ra-el stems from the Hebrew word ISH which is used to identify Adam in the second chapter of Genesis. The words Ish-ra-el mean “Prince, ruling with the King.” In other words, a SON ruling with the FATHER. It does not pertain to the word “Jew” and never did. The word “Jew” stems from the Hebrew word “Yehudi.” The Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition 1910-1911, vol. IV says: “YEHUDI - a Gnostic sect of the 2nd century; was known by the name Cainites. They are first mentioned by Ireanaous, who connects them with the Valentinians. They believe that Cain derived his existence from the superior power and Abel from the inferior power, and that in this respect he was the first of a line which included Esay, Karah, the sodomites and JUDAS ISCARIOT.” This says that Judas Iscariot was a descendant of CAIN who is a YEHUDI! We know that Judas Iscariot (Judas of Kerioth) was a Jew. Kerioth was a location in Southern Judea occupied by the Yehudi, who were not permitted in the congregation of Israel in Jerusalem and Northern Judea. We also know that Cain was NOT an offspring of Adam but was literally an offspring of Satan by his seduction of Eve. In Genesis, where Eve speaks to Adam regarding the birth of Cain, the translators have again made a mess. Chapter 4, Verse 1 of Genesis uses the word “Lord” in the English translation. One of the names used by Satan was Baal and Baali. Look in a Bible Dictionary or a Concordance for the word Baal or Baali. The translation is the word “LORD”. What Eve really said was, “I have gotten a man from Baal.” Translators replaced the word Baal with Lord.

Now we can understand why in I John 3:12 it says: “Not as Cain, WHO WAS OF THAT WICKED ONE……” - Who is that wicked one other than Satan or Baal himself? We can also now understand what Jesus meant when He said to those Jews surrounding Him in that day, “That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharaius son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.” Jesus identified these Jews as the descendants of the one who murdered Abel. This was CAIN! Cain’s father was Baali (Satan), therefore Cain’s descendants (seed) are also the ones referred to in Genesis 3:15 and elsewhere as the Bible and Jesus Christ revealed. For instance:

Another parable put He forth unto them, saying, The Kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field; but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat and went his way…Then Jesus sent the multitude away and went into the house; and His disciples came unto Him saying, declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field. He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of Man; the field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; the enemy that sowed them is the devil…””(Matthew 13:24-39)

Jesus is speaking of the CHILDREN OF GOD and the CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL! He said that the GOOD seed is the seed of Adam! The descendants of Adam are the seed of God and the descendants of Cain are the seed of Satan! Yehudi (Jews) are the seed of Cain! For instance:

Jesus, speaking to the Jews: “I know that ye say ye are Abraham’s seed; but ye seek to kill Me because My word has no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with the Father and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.” They answered Him, “Abraham is our Father.” Jesus said unto them, “If ye were Abraham’s children ye would do the works of Abraham; but ye seek to kill Me; Abraham would not do this. Ye do the deeds of your father.” Then they said to Him, “We were not born of fornication, we have one father, even God “(they were claiming to be God’s children) - Jesus said to them “If God were your father ye would love Me…why do you not understand My speech? Because you cannot hear My word. Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (Cain murdered Abel) and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie he speaks of his own for he is a liar and the father of lies. Because I tell you the truth ye do not believe Me. And if I speak the truth why do you not believe Me? He that is of God hears God’s words; ye therefore hear them not BECAUSE YE ARE NOT F GOD!” (John 8).

Now that you have heard the words of God, let a so-called Clergyman tell you that the Jews are God’s Chosen people? How Long - how long O Israel - are you going to believe these Jewish FABLES? How long - how long O Israel, are you going to believe the devil instead of your God Jesus Christ?

Again, one might say: “What does this have to do with the Middle East situation?” It has EVERYTHING to do with it!

The Israelites of the Bible are God’s Servants! The Israelites of the Bible are the descendants of Adam, the seed of God!! Jesus identifies the Jews as the seed (descendants) of Satan - then HOW COULD THE JEWS BE THE ISRAELITES OF THE BIBLE?????

For instance: Jesus said, “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel” …and turning to the Jews, He says “But ye believe not , BECAUSE YE ARE NOT MY SHEEP, as I said unto you.” Now listen again, The HOUSE of Israel ARE His sheep and the Jews are NOT His sheep, therefore the Jews are NOT of the House of Israel! There are some who claim that the Jews are the tribe of Judah. If this were true, it would place the Jews IN the House of Israel because the tribe of Judah IS of the House of Israel. In that case, who is right? The one who says that the Jews are of the House of Israel or Jesus Christ who said that the Jews are NOT of the House of Israel? As for me, I stand with Jesus Christ. The Jews are exactly who Jesus says they are! It is no wonder they hate Him and they hate us Christ’s sons - and Jesus told us that too. (John 15:18-27).

Again one might say, “What does this have to do with the Middle East situation?” It has EVERYTHING to do with the Middle East situation!

Remember, it is the Israelites of the Bible who have title to the Holy Land! The Sheep of Jesus Christ are the House of Israel - or the Israelites of the Bible. The Jews are NOT His sheep and are NOT of the House of Israel, therefore the Jews are NOT the Israelites of the Bible and the Jews therefore have NOT RIGHT NOR TITLE to the Holy Land!

One might say at this point “What about the Arabs?” We again refer to the Scripture where it says “do not give heed to Jewish fables.” The Arabs have been screwed, blued and tattooed just as much as the nations of Israel (Christian nations) by the fables. The Arabs do not seem to know who they are any more than the true Israelites (now known by a new name - Christian). Jesus Christ, with Mary and Joseph were protected by the Arabs when they went to Egypt from Bethlehem. Why? Because the Arabs are the true children of Abraham by Hagar. They are known biblically as the children of Ishmael and they are relatives of true Israel. (True Israel are the Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, Celtic, Lombard, Germanic nations). Remember? Abraham’s seed were to become MANY nations? Where have the Jews become MANY nations? Also read back in this article where Jesus said the Jews were NOT the children of Abraham but were the descendants of Cain who was long before Abraham. Abraham was NOT a Jew but was an Israelite. And the Arabs are descendants of Abraham! But the Arabs are NOT Jews and are NOT related to the Jews in any manner. If there has been any inter-mixture then the offspring are Jews and not Arabs. They would be obliged to follow the example of Ezra, then there wouldn’t be so many Jew spies in Arab lands.

Now, what does this have to do with the Middle-East situation? It has EVERYTHING to do with the Middle-Ease situation!

The United States of America, as well as all of the nations from Abraham’s seed, are CHRISTIAN nations. The United States of America is the “New Jerusalem” of the Bible. Now, tell me, where is there any authority for Christ’s people to aid and assist the ENEMIES of Jesus Christ (the Jews)?

Let us again return to the Scriptures. The God of Israel is speaking and it is “unto US a child is born, unto us a Son is given and the GOVERNMENT shall be upon His shoulder and His Name shall be called wonderful, Counselor, the Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace.” (Isaiah 9:6). If that Prince of Peace is not Jesus Christ, then who is it? Who else except the God of Israel, the Creator of the Universe, could raise Lazarus from the dead after the body had stunk for four days? Who else could allow the children of Satan to crucify Him and then resurrect and meet with His disciples, telling them to sell their coats and buy a sword? Wake up Israel - Thy God is ONE God, thou shall have no other gods before thee - and Jesus Christ is that God. Every document of the government of the United States of America is dated in the Year of our God and the date is the birth of Jesus Christ, the ONLY God recognized by the founders of this great CHRISTIAN Constitutional Republic!

Now, what does this have to do with the Middle East situation? It has EVERYTHING to do with the Middle-East situation!

The Scriptures have foretold! If the leaders of the United States of America and other Christian nations continue to be duped, bought, purchased or deceived by the anti-Christ Jews and their money-power - there will be a Christian uprising in this land that will be more violent than any Jewish-backed black revolution they have ever witnessed! All of the world is awaiting the manifestation of the sons of God. The Jews have no legal, Biblical or any other right, title, or interest in and to the Holy Land in the Middle East. They are of the family of Cain and the land of Cain was in Asiatic Russia - known as Siberia. The land of Og and Magog.

The Arab leaders have been betrayed by the Jews who control the Soviet Union and the Jews who control the government of the United States of America! The Christians of the United States have been betrayed by these same elements! The Jew power in the U.S. has forced the Arabs to turn to the Jew-Soviet Union and makes the Arabs appear pro-Communist. This is Satan’s trick. It is Jew trickery. When the chips are down in any Middle East war with the Jews, isn’t it smart for the Jews to be providing the arms for the Arabs? They could stop the flow of ammunition and spare parts at a critical moment as they determine that critical moment to be.

The Jews hit several birds with one stone when they force the Arabs to deal with the Soviet Union. The propaganda wheels roll throughout the Jew-controlled mass media of communication that the Arabs are PRO-Communist. This is to win the emotional and psychological war with the American people and turn them against the Arabs. After all, the American people could not support a pro-Communist Arab. Further, the Jews plan to use United States troops in the Middle East against the Arabs. They plan to do this under the guise of the United Nations. The troops would be called United Nations troops, just as they were in Korea and Vietnam. In order to insure that these troops will not go combat loony and shoot up Jew villages or Jew civilians, the Stern family, secret stockholders of the Federal Reserve, have financed the phony Mai Lai Incident in Vietnam. This is as phony as a three dollar bill and is to establish a precedent in military law for future use in the Middle East - just in case our troops got wild.

But the most important problem related to the Middle East situation is the RELIGIOUS aspect not so much as the political. The religious aspect involves the racial aspect. Most of our Christian people have been duped and deceived by their own Clergy. The Bible IS a “racial” Book. It is the history of the “race of Adam” which is what we call the Caucasian race. They are called the Caucasian because they are the true Israelites who departed from the Middle East area and migrated through the Caucasus (the Pass of Israel) into the areas of Western Europe and subsequently to the New land, the New Jerusalem. We are as far West as we can go. We must now look to the Scriptures and obey our God. We shall not retreat! We shall fight on this line. And those who oppose us will be in opposition to our God Jesus Christ who is with us. When Jesus Christ is with us, who can defeat us? The chips are down! Jesus Christ has declared this war! Let this be a warning to all of the proselyted politicians today. You may NOT support or give our money and blessings to the anti-Christ except that you will be “held to answer” in the day of judgment. And that day of judgment will be HERE on this earth - not in some future place where most people expect to go but hope within their own minds that they will not go to hell. Giving aid to the enemies of Jesus Christ will bring about a hell right here on this earth!!!

‘NUFF SAID !!


 

U. S. A. IN THE BIBLE

When I tell someone that the United States of America is in the Bible, they look at me with a blank stare and say that they have never heard of such a thing. In fact, when anyone mentions the Bible, people seem to grind some gear in their heads and immediately think in terms of “Church” and “Religion.” Actually, the Bible says nothing about Church and Religion as such. Abraham Lincoln said, “The Bible is the Book of Life.”

In the study of Law and government one finds that the United States of America is a Constitutional Republic. It is a union of separate sovereign STATES formed under a compact (contract) between themselves. The original contract was the Articles of Confederation. It is important to understand that the Articles came from the BIBLE and were adopted by the original States to be in effect forever. The actual word used was “perpetual,” which means “forever.”

The smooth functioning of a so-called federal government was ineffective under the Articles of Confederation because the States would not give sufficient powers to the agent created by the Articles. As a result, the Constitution of the United States was an effort to improve the situation. The Preamble to the Constitution reads: “We the people, in order to form a MORE PERFECT Union…”. Our question here is, “More perfect from what?” Obviously, more perfect from the Union that was formed under the Articles of Confederation which had the BIBLE as its source. The Constitution was lifted from the Articles of Confederation, therefore the source of the Constitution is the BIBLE. Because the Articles of Confederation were adopted to be in effect forever, it was necessary to adopt all those provisions not picked up in the Constitution as Statutes known as the United States Code. The United States Code, along with the Constitution, constitutes what is known as the Organic Law of the United States.

It is important to understand that the original States would not accept the new Constitution until some matters of power were cleared up. The Constitution is a CONTRACT between the STATES and by this contract, they were creating an agency known as the “federal government.” The States were NOT willing to give certain powers to this agent, therefore they did not put the contract into effect until the first Ten Amendments were made a part of the original contract. These are known as the “Bill of Rights.” A reading of the first Ten Amendments makes it clear that the agency of the States (the federal government) has ONLY those powers which are enumerated for it in the contract. All others remain with the States and the people. In fact, the federal government has no rights whatsoever. Only “powers” AND THEN ONLY THOSE POWERS WHICH HAVE BEEN ENUMERATED IN THE CONSTITUTION.

At this point we realize that the Constitution is a divinely inspired document. This means that God had something to do with it. If God had something to do with it then the Biblical source is more awe-inspiring than we can imagine. We must then do as Jesus Christ said, “Search the Scriptures.” When we do this, we must also understand that it is our God and His Word. The following story is one based upon this very thing. We know that it is “truth,” even though it has not been revealed to God’s people in the past. It must be the time for them to know and understand - therefore this booklet is being written. Those who have eyes will see and those who have ears will hear. We seek the Truth.

In order to confine our work to a small space, we must eliminate much detail and hit the high spots. We will take the reader back in time to the days of Enoch and Job. In that day, Enoch took 144,000 Savants of the Adamic race into the land we know today as Egypt. There they built a great city called “On.” It had the libraries and centers of learning. The race of people brought by Enoch were known by several names as time progressed. These were Ar-ya, which means sons of Yah. They were also known as Hyksos Shepherd Kings. It might be mentioned here that Moses married a daughter of one of the ancient Hyksos Shepherd Kings and the So-har describes her as tall, blue-eyed and fair. The race had a Priesthood in Egypt known as the “Order of the Masonos.” Their symbol was the Square and the Compass as they were known as the “Builder Race.” As time progressed, these men went to the Isles we know as Britain and there became known as the Druids and Culdees. They built Stonehenge for the measurement of the heavens and were also known as Astronomer Priests. They built the same circle of stones at Carnac in Brittany and the Dorings of Persia. It was from this background that Abram came on the scene many hundreds of years later. We see Abram leaving the land of Ur of the Chaldees (Chaldeans) where Nimrod was Prime Minister. God told Abram to leave that land and his seed would be blessed. “Of thy seed shall I make many nations.” A “nation” is a family with a King.

We then follow the story of Abraham and see that he had Isaac. The word Saxon stems from Isaac’s-sons. Isaac had Jacob and Esau,but Esau lost the inheritance because he went out and took Canaanite wives. Jacob married into his own race (the Adamic race) and was therefore blessed and his name was changed to an ancient title used in the days of Enoch. This title is three words, Ish-Ra-El, which means issue or progeny, ruling with God. Ish means progeny, Ra means to rule and El was an ancient name for the modern word “God.”

As time passes, we see Jacob raising a large family now called by his new title, Israel. They were twelve brothers and they returned to the land where their ancestors had been in the days of Enoch and Job - Egypt. There, Pharaohs had remained and descended from the same stock as the children of Israel. Joseph became a leader in the country and married a daughter of the High Priest of On. The So-har describes her as tall, blue-eyed and of fair complexion. Because of this marriage into his own race, Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh were blessed by Jacob (Israel) and the twelve families became thirteen. It was by divine direction that Moses led them out of Egypt. When they set camp, the tribe of Levi was placed in the center, three tribes were on the East, three on the West, three on the North and three on the South. Each tribe had its standard before its tents and the twelve standards of the tribes of Israel are the twelve signs of the Zodiac.

A study of Scandinavian history will reveal that the great Viking Kings had the standards of the tribes of Israel behind their great banquet tables. They must have known their ancestry!

We return to God’s promise that Abraham’s seed were to become many nations. As they had one King (God) over them, they asked for men Kings. God warned them of the trouble this would cause but gave them their wish. They then began to violate God’s laws for government. He said that they were a stiff-necked, stubborn people and prescribed a punishment period for them. This is known theologically as the 7-Times punishment prophecy. In the days of Solomon, God divided them into two nations and then set their punishment or captivity in the wilderness as 7-Times and then each would become a new nation. We see that a “Time” is a cycle or a circle and it contains the numerical value of 360 degrees. One Biblical Time is 360 years and 7-Times is 2,520 years. We take the Usher date for the captivity of the tribe of Dan and the 2,520 years of 7-Times to that date. History confirms that on the exact date, Denmark became a nation by crowning its first King. Denmark gets its name from the tribe of Dan. Dan’s Mark! Seven Times from the date of Ishacaar’s captivity is the date of the first King for Finland. Incidentally, the Finnish war song is “On to War Ye Men of Ishacaar.” On the same time schedule for the tribe of Reuben, Holland had its first Monarch. The Dutch have the song, “Reuben, Reuben, I’ve Been Thinkin’.” The Dutch therefore must know that they are the tribe of Reuben. Again, on the exact time schedule were the following: Simeon - SPAIN, Zebulun - FRANCE, Gad - ITALY, Napthali - NORWAY, Judah - GERMANY, Benjamin - ICELAND, Asher - SWEDEN and the two tribes of the House of Joseph, EPHRAIM and MANASSEH. On the same time schedule, 2,520 years from the date of Ephraim’s captivity, the Union Jack was adopted and England became a Commonwealth. The Bible says that Ephraim shall be a nation and a company of nations and that is exactly what the British Commonwealth is. Now, we come closer to home. By the same exact time schedule, 2,520 years from the tribe of Manasseh’s captivity, we arrive at the date of July 4th, 1776.

We now go back to the days of Enoch in Egypt and the Great Pyramid. On its base we find the numbers 1776, inscribed thousands of years before Abraham’s day. We find this great Pyramid on our dollar bill as the Great Seal of the United States. There are 13 levels to the Pyramid, 13 letters in the words Annuit Coeptis (God shall favor thy beginnings), there were 13 tribes of Israel, 13 Colonies and 13 States. As we look at the Great Seal of the United States, we see the spread wings of the great Eagle which John tells about in the Book of Revelation. We see a cloud cluster with 13 stars, a shield with 13 stripes, 13 olive leaves in one claw of the Eagle and 13 arrows in the other claw. The written records of Congress relating to the adoption of the Great Seal of the United States make declaration to the fact that it is the Seal of Manasseh. We now take you into the Bible in the Books of Deuteronomy and Leviticus where God tells His people Israel that He will make of that OLD Jerusalem a land of abomination and desolation. He will give them a NEW JerUSAlem. He describes it in the Bible as a land with a great sea on the East and a great sea on the West. It will be divided by great rivers and mountains and have all of the brass in the land. It will be a land of milk and honey, where the box trees and the fir trees grow. It will lend to all and borrow from none. It will never be defeated in war. It will be the only nation with the Most High Yahweh (Jesus) as its King and it will be a gathering of My people from My nations. (The tribes of Israel are the “nations”).

Historical records offer conclusive evidence that George Washington was aware of the Bible prophecy for this nation. He said that he would not accept any Royal Title. We must call him President because this nation already had a King. It is Jesus Christ. All official documents of this government are dated in the year of Our Lord.…and the date is the birth of Jesus Christ, the only God and King recognized by the Founders of this great Christian Constitutional Republic.

The United States of America is in the Bible. You cannot get the USA out of the word “jerUSAlem”!!

There has been much confusion when the Christian of today is faced with his true Identity as the Israelite of the Bible. A question always arises as to the identity of those who have been falsely claiming this position during the past many hundreds of years.

The Clergy of most Christian denominations refuse to review their theological positions of the past. Many are staunchly steeped in the doctrines of men and do not seek the truth even though Scripture says: “Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” (Timothy 2:15). Those who have preached falsely do not wish to repent. Others do not know the difference between truth and error.

To those who would dispute the position that present-day Christians of the Adamic race are the Israel (Ish-ra-Eli) of the Bible, we make our position clear. This truth is ordained of Jesus Christ whom we know to be the ONE and ONLY God of Israel. He is the Creator of the Universe; the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, all ONE.


 

THE POSSE COMITATUS

By Authority Of The Constitution Of The United States

In the formation of this Constitutional Republic, the COUNTY has always been - and remains to this day - the TRUE seat of government for the citizens who are inhabitants thereof. The County Sheriff is the only legal law enforcement officer in these United States of America.

The Sheriff can mobilize all men between the ages of 18 and 45 who are in good health and not in the federal military service. OTHERS CAN VOLUNTEER! This body of citizens is the SHERIFF’S POSSE. All of them serve when called by the Sheriff. The Title of this Body is POSSE COMITATUS.

This Posse is the entire body of those inhabitants who may be summoned by the Sheriff, or who may volunteer, to preserve the public peace or execute any lawful precept that is opposed. Since the Sheriff is the servant of the citizens who are inhabitants of the County, it is not his choice as to whether or not the Posse is organized and brought into being. It is only his choice as to whether or not he wishes to use it.

The Sheriff is under Oath of Office to uphold, preserve and defend the Constitution of these United States and the State in which his County exists. NOTHING MORE! It is his duty to protect citizens from unlawful acts of any person, including agencies of government. It should be emphasized that this protection extends to citizens who are being subjected to unlawful acts by officials of government, whether these be Judges of Courts or Federal or State Agents of any kind whatsoever.

CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEPTS

The Constitution of these United States is the SUPREME LAW for the States of the Union as well as FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, which has been CREATED BY THE STATES. Since the Constitution is a compact (contract) by and between the People, existing as States - which are separate, sovereign Republics within the United States - it should be made clear that the Federal Government is an “agency of the States.” The federal government is a “servant” of the States and the People, NOT THEIR MASTER! “Verily, I say unto you, the servant is not greater than his lord.” John 13:16 (THE WORDS OF THE GOD OF THIS NATION - JESUS CHRIST).

The Constitution is a simple document. An expression of Christian law derived from the Holy Bible. It says what it means and it means what it says. It means today what it meant when it was written. For example, the Ninth Amendment says, “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be constructed to deny or disparage others RETAINED by the people.” This simply means that because the contract enumerated rights for the States, that the listing of these rights does not mean that the same must be done for the People but that the PEOPLE retain ALL RIGHTS without having them enumerated in the contract. The Tenth Amendments says: “The powers (no “rights” here, - Ed.) not delegated to the United States (Federal government - Ed.) by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” This simply means that the Federal government has ONLY those powers (no “rights” - Ed.) which have been listed for it in the Constitution. If the power is not listed, then the Federal government DOES NOT HAVE IT! All powers not listed for the Federal government in THE CONTRACT, remain with the States or to the People.

Since a guide of this type cannot possibly anticipate each and every local problem or condition, it should be utilized where the Constitution and the Natural Law is being violated. In many instances such violations may involve officials of the Federal Government or local government as much as by individual citizens. In the interest of education, some of the most prolific violations by government officials and government agencies are included here as major examples which should be contemplated by all citizens interested in the Posse Comitatus.

MAJOR VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND NATURAL LAW

1. EDUCATION AND THE SCHOOLS:

The Federal Congress has been “legislating” in the area of education and the schools. The Federal, and in some instances the State Judiciary, have entered the area of education and the schools, in fact, directing that certain conditions be met to satisfy the Judiciary. Read the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution. Read the entire Constitution and one will not find any power given to any branch of the Federal Government in the area of education and the schools. Since it is not enumerated in the contract, the Federal government does NOT have it. Then all such Acts of any branch of the Federal government (Legislative, Executive or Judiciary) are ultra-vires, unConstitutional and NOT LAW. In fact, officials of the federal government, by enacting such pretended legislation and Courts edicts, are in violation of their respective Oaths of Office to uphold, preserve and defend the Constitution. This is defined by law as a CRIMINAL ACT! (Ultra-vires as used herein, means “as though it had never been enacted in the first instance”).

It should be made clear to ALL officials of government (Federal, State and local) that the schools (public, not government) belong to the PEOPLE who pay the taxes in the local school district. It should further be made clear to all persons concerned, that there is NOT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT for anyone to attend any public school. Education is a “privilege” and it is not granted by government but by the local taxpayers who own the schools in the respective school districts.

POSSE ACTION: County Sheriffs must be advised of the instances where unlawful acts of officials or agencies of government are committed in respect to education and the schools. It is the duty of the Sheriff to protect the local citizens from such unlawful acts. Once he has been advised and refuses to perform his lawful duty in respect to the matter, the Posse Comitatus has the lawful right under natural law to act in the Name of the Sheriff to protect local jurisdiction. Since the Second Amendment to the Constitution says “…the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed…”, the local Posse Comitatus has the right to bear arms in the execution of the law, any Act of any legislature or directives issued by the Judiciary or Executive notwithstanding. Arrests may be made. The criminal may be remanded to the custody of the County Sheriff from citizens of the local jurisdiction. (NOT by the Courts as is current procedure in most counties and which has no basis under law.)

2. THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM:

Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution prohibits the States from making anything but gold and silver COIN a tender in payment of debts. By law, One Dollar must equal 23.22 grains of pure gold or 371.25 grains of pure silver. Citizens of the United States cannot obtain such coin simply because none is available. Why is it not available; Because the Federal Congress has unlawfully violated Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. It has unlawfully abdicated the power mandated by the States and the People “To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures.” (Art. I, Sec. 8). The Federal Congress has unlawfully delegated this power to a privately owned Federal Reserve System which pays NO TAXES and is not audited nor subject to regulation by any agency of the Federal government. It is a private monopoly which neither the People nor the States authorized in the Constitution. The Federal Reserve Act (38 Stat. 251; U.S.C. 221) enacted December 23rd, 1913 is in violation of the Constitution and is therefore ultra-vires and not law.

It is quite obvious that the solution to the problem lies in the hands of the Federal Congress. It can and must be solved. It is not the purpose of this guide to outline the solution, although this could be done if it would fit the purpose and not require excessive space. The area of correction on a state or local level might be to enforce Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution. It is suggested that persons wishing to obtain detailed information on the subject, send $5.00 to the Daly Eagle, Box 177, Savage, Minnesota ordering the material published by Atty. Jerome Daly.

3. THE GRADUATED INCOME TAX:

Title 26, United States Code, enacted by Congress and known as the Internal Revenue Code, is completely in violation of the Constitution, therefore it is ultra-vires, unlawful and not binding upon the People nor the States of the Union.

The entire Code is a string of unconstitutional abuses which attempt to require a citizen’s consent to the repudiation and violation of his God-given and Constitutional rights. Beginning with Section 6012 - “Persons Required To make Returns of Income” - it says that a citizen must voluntarily give up his rights under the Fourth Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment, the Seventh Amendment and in general, the entire Constitution. It should be noted that Section 6012 does NOT provide for tax payments nor does it establish a TAX. When a citizen complies with Section 6012, he is not obeying the law but is being “trapped” into voluntarily surrendering his Constitutional rights and protections. When the Courts have ruled that known communists and murderers may not be deprived of their Constitutional rights, it is absolute nonsense to believe that an Act of Congress or any other branch of government may make a good citizen do so. Have you ever thought of the fact that until you voluntarily give up these “rights,” that there is no income tax? There can be no income tax until the Return, with the unlawful information under unlawful conditions is completed. Then comes Section 7203 of the Internal Revenue code. “Willful Failure To File Returns, Supply Information Or Pay Tax.” This is another unlawful statute which attempts to back up Section 6012 which doesn’t say a word about paying tax. This merely threatens a citizen for not voluntarily giving up his rights and protections which are guaranteed by the Constitution. How silly can they be?

Any official of government, including judges of the Courts, who attempts to enforce such unlawful (pretended) legislation should be removed from office. Where instances are known, the POSSE COMITATUS should prepare an “Order For Arrest” of the government official involved. The arrest should be made and the criminal remanded to the custody of the County Sheriff for imprisonment and trail by a Citizen’s Jury. This Jury should be impaneled by the Sheriff from citizens of the local jurisdiction. The present method of impaneling Juries by the courts is unlawful and should be repudiated by the local Posses.

4. THE JUDICIARY:

There are always some exceptions to the rule, but the rule for the Judiciary, both State and Federal, has been subtle subversion of the Constitution of these United States. The subversion and contempt for the Constitution by the Judiciary is joined by the Executive and Legislative branches of government. It is apparent that the Judiciary has attempted to alter our Form of Government. By unlawful administrative acts and procedures, they have attempted to establish a “Dictatorship of the Courts” over the citizens of this Republic. The legal profession has, with few exceptions, conspired with the Judiciary for the purposes outlined above.

The Constitution of the United States is clear and concise in its delegation of powers to the Federal Judiciary. In fact, the only Federal Court established by the Constitution is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is not the “highest Court in the land” as most people are told. In fact, it is the lowest Court. The highest court in the land is the Justice of the Peace Court which is closest to the People! It is a local COUNTY Court. All other Federal Courts are ordained and established by the Congress. (See Art. III, Sec. 1, Cl. 1).

The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, do NOT hold office for life, but only DURING GOOD BEHAVIOR! Disregard for the Constitution is not good behavior on the part of any Judge. It is a violation of his Oath of Office. In the establishment of the interior Federal Courts, the Congress is limited to the extent that any legislative Act must be in pursuance of the Constitution. The Congress may not amend the Constitution nor may it delegate its powers as mandated by that contract. The Federal Congress has violated these mandates particularly in passage of the “Administrative Procedures Act of 1946.” This Act attempts to invalidate the basic rights guaranteed to individual citizens by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Under this unlawful Act, rules and regulations have been promulgated by agencies of government such as the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Health, Education & Welfare as well as the Federal Courts. By this Act the Congress attempted to abdicate its mandated legislative powers, delivering those powers to the Executive and Judicial branches of government. Federal Judges, U.S. Attorneys and other law enforcement officials, including lawyers as officers of the court, are compelled to repudiate their Oath of Office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. Under “color of law” they are forced to collaborate in a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice, disfranchise citizens and liquidate the Constitutional Republic of these United States. Under these unlawful rules and procedures, citizens have been arrested by Court Orders, intimated, threatened and harassed with and without trial by jury or due process of law as guaranteed by the Constitution. Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution requires the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, BY JURY. The 5th Amendment reads as follows:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital or other infamous crime unless on a presentment or indictment of a GRAND JURY, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service, in time of war or public danger, nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. NOR BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE, LIBERTY OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.”

Basically the Judiciary has only the power to “Rule upon cases at law.” The ruling is the “law for the case” and nothing more. It is NOT THE “LAW OF THE LAND” as most people have been told. When a case or a question of a legislative act is brought before a court, the CONSTITUTION is the supreme Law of the land and it must be the basis for the ruling by the court. A “LAW” is a CONSTITUTIONAL Act of a legislative body. If a legislative Act is not in pursuance of the Constitution, it is NOT LAW, but merely ultra-vires legislation. The Judiciary has NOT been given the power to INTERPRET the Constitution as most people have been told. If it were to have that power it must be enumerated for the Judiciary in THE CONSTITUTION. It is NOT enumerated, therefore the 9th and 10th Amendments apply. “The powers NOT DELEGATED to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respective, OR TO THE PEOPLE.”

Some examples of the Judiciary’s subversion of the Constitution are in the issuance of so-called “Court Orders.” These are apparently in pursuant of the UNLAWFUL “administrative procedures” mentioned previously.

Citizens have been arrested, jailed and held unlawfully upon issuance of these so-called “COURT ORDERS”, being deprived of their rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The Governors of STATES have been threatened with these so-called Court Orders, particularly in the matter of education and the schools. These acts of the Judiciary are UNLAWFUL attempts to subvert the Constitution. Such acts are attempts to replace the lawfully elected Executives of States who are the legal law enforcement officials of their respective states. They were elected by the PEOPLE and cannot be removed by any so-called “Court Order” or unlawful act of the Judiciary! Since many elected officials of State and Federal government have been in the legal profession prior to their election to public office, it is obvious that they have been somewhat “brainwashed” to accept these unlawful acts of the Judiciary. They must be “re-educated” or be removed from office. Posse action is recommended in these instances in the same manner as outlined in Item 1 of this Guide titled “Education and the Schools.” For additional information is it recommended that all members of Posses send for the publications by LUCILLE E. MORAN - P.O. Box 187, Islamorada, Florida 33036.

5. CONCLUSION:

All citizens who volunteer as members of locally organized POSSE COMITATUS should research their local LAW LIBRARY on the subject of “Posse Comitatus.” You will learn that the Natural or Common Law of your country provides for the Posse Comitatus and for Posse action. In some instances of record the law provides for the following prosecution of officials of government who commit criminal acts or who violate their Oath of Office: “He shall be removed by the Posse to the most populated intersection of streets in the township and at high noon be there hung by the neck, the body remaining until sundown as an example to those who would subvert the law.”

The unlawful use of County Sheriffs as “lackeys” of the Courts should be discontinued at once. There is no lawful authority, for Judges and the Courts to direct the law enforcement activities of a County Sheriff. The Sheriff is accountable and responsible only to the citizens who are inhabitants of his County. He is under Oath of Office and need not receive unlawful Orders from Judges of the Courts. They are the Judiciary but the Sheriff is of the Executive branch of our government. He is responsible to protect citizens, even from unlawful acts of officials of government. If he refuses to do so, he should be removed from office promptly.


A CHALLENGE AND INDICTMENT OF ENTRENCHED BAR MEMBERS

By LUCILLE MORAN

The Constitutions of the several States of this Union each has an article similar to Article I, Section 2, of the Constitution of the State of California, which reads:

“All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security and benefit of the people and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good may require it.”

This expression of the principal underlying our GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE did not originate in California. Nor, was it ever intended as mere abracadabra for the vain and self-righteous to read over the heads of other high falutin’ or mentally lazy types. For, however vague and token in quality the California version, it, nevertheless, is a re-echoing of the Revolutionary issue that caused grizzly Massachusetts’ farmers to surround Concord bridge and fire the “shot heard around the world.”

The first clue to understanding the significance of our separation from England lies in the term “revolution,” itself. The word “revolution” means a radical change, an about-face, or otherwise stated, a complete turn-round. Look it up yourself and you will find, among others, that Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines the term “revolution” in the political sense as: “A fundamental change in political organization or in a government or Constitution; the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler, and the substitution of another, by the governed; as the American Revolution or Revolutionary War…”

Unfortunately, even Webster’s doesn’t make a distinction between the Revolution and the War for Independence. The Revolution existed long before the bloody fighting and should NOT be confused with the War for Independence - which came afterwards to prove that these virile Americans meant business and weren’t just talkers, debaters, or hand wringers.

The Revolution came first. It was an awakening CHANGE in the Minds and mood of American colonists causing them to intellectually revolt against the British political scheme of control by fixed classes. The English system is based on a scheme of over-lords, so designed as to be self-perpetuating. Its political psychology operates on the proposition that the Monarch and her (his) consortium are the STATE (or government) and by this design everyone else is made answerable and accountable to them. The Monarch secured herself (himself) in the role of principal by appointing the judges, thus making them her (his) agents. British prosecutors don’t even pretend to speak for the public at-large. They are openly called the Queen’s (or King’s) counsel. From this, it should be easy to see that the whole strategy relies on maintaining a handful of people in control of the courts in order to make everyone else dependent upon them.

However, that was NOT all that Yankee Revolutionaries determined to turn around at all costs. The British political strategy rests its case on the further presumption that rights, liberties and freedoms DO NOT inhere naturally in the human dimension, but are instead awarded by “gracious” consent of the Crown, who, of course directly through her (his) agents, could just as “graciously” withdraw them solely on the claim of holding “better” political credentials than upright members of the body politic. Perhaps, you now grasp the profound challenge that Jefferson set forth in the opening paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence about all people being political equals until their acts and conduct prove them otherwise, one way or another.

That T. Jefferson, Lawyer-without-license and Architect-without-portfolio, drew the Master plan for this NATION OF COMMONERS is best seen from the Constitutions of two original States where the action was - Massachusetts and New Hampshire. (All other State Constitutions are less reliable as references, and some, so removed by time and distance from the Revolutionary scene, are abridged to the point of being downright unsatisfactory). However, both of these State Constitutions were written and ratified BEFORE the Federal Constitution, for which they served as blueprints, and NEITHER OF THEM HAS BEEN WATERED DOWN BY RE-WRITING. These show that under the psychology or OUR Revolutionary self-government mandate, members of the body politic are supreme and are themselves the State (or government) and people living off the public payrolls are answerable and accountable to members of the body politic NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND - as under the British Adversary system.

Article 8 of the New Hampshire Constitution entitled ACCOUNTABILITY OF MAGISTRATES AND OFFICERS reads as follows: “All power residing originally in and being derived from the people, all the magistrates and officers of government are their substitutes and agents, and are at all times accountable to them.” However, Article V of the Massachusetts Constitution spells the same thing out a bit more specifically: “All power residing originally in the people, and being derived from them, the several magistrates and officers of government, vested with authority, WHETHER LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE OR JUDICIAL, are their substitutes and agents, AND ARE AT ALL TIMES ACCOUNTABLE TO THEM.” (Emphasis supplied)

If you are still dubious about shouldering the Revolutionary demands necessary for maintaining our self-government system, I cite for you Article the 10th of New Hampshire’s Constitution, which not only bans any political designs patterned after the British RULE OF MEN scheme, but provides explicit instructions for curing the disease should it prove recurrent. It is unabashedly entitled RIGHT OF REVOLUTION.

“Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the WHOLE community, AND NOT FOR THE PRIVATE INTEREST or EMOLUMENT OF ANY ONE MAN, FAMILY OR CLASS OF MEN; THEREFORE, WHENEVER THE ENDS OF GOVERNMENT ARE PERVERTED, and public LIBERTY MANIFESTLY ENDANGERED, AND ALL OTHER MEANS OF REDRESS INEFFECTUAL, THE PEOPLE MAY, AND OF RIGHT OUT TO REFORM THE OLD, OR ESTABLISH A NEW GOVERNMENT. THE DOCTRINE OF NON-RESISTANCE AGAINST ARBITRARY POWER, AND OPPRESSION, IS ABSURD, SLAVISH AND DESTRUCTIVE OF THE GOOD AND HAPPINESS OF MANKIND.” (Emphasis supplied).

Article VI of Massachusetts’ Constitution still reads to this day: “No man, nor corporation or ASSOCIATION OF MEN, have any other title to obtain advantages or particular and exclusive privileges, distinct from those of the community, than what arises from the consideration of services rendered to the public…” (Emphasis supplied).

While not so explicit in detailing your rights and mine as the Constitutions of New Hampshire and Massachusetts, the Federal Constitution vigorously backs them up in the plain language of Amendment Articles IX and X, which read respectively: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR DISPARAGE OTHERS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE.”

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, ARE RESERVED TO THE STATES RESPECTIVELY, OR TO THE PEOPLE.” (Emphasis supplied).

Now, I don’t know about you, but I consider myself “people” and I notice that the EBB (entrenched bench-bar) just happens to be a private “association of men,” who have presumed to take “title to obtain advantages, or particular and exclusive privileges, distinct from those of the community.” But I also just happen to reject the kind of services they patronizingly purport to render as a satchel of shop-worn swindles that only intellectual-welfare-cases, who have failed to do their homework, would try to pass off on me in the first place.

Pure prophesy must have inspired Jefferson to caution, “The greatest danger to the Republic will be presented by the Judicial branch of the government. It will usurp the powers of the Legislative and Executive branches and thereby establish a ‘Dictatorship of the Judiciary’ over the people of this land.”

Even gentle Abe Lincoln showed his fealty to the Revolutionary cause when he said, “The people of these United States are the rightful masters of both the Courts and the Congress - not to overthrow the Constitution - BUT TO OVERTHROW THE MEN WHO PERVERT THE CONSTITUTION.”

Neither of these perceptive Heroes was here, however, to see the scheme for usurpation-by-association take form. Neither was I, but by long and diligent researches, I discovered it was launched around 1910 when State-wide bar associations began organizing. Somewhat later, these political collectives were confederated under a central association called the American Bar Association. Now every 10th Century Revolutionary worth his salt knows these moves laid the groundwork for relieving present-day members of the body politic of any control over the courts and judiciary, among other things, on the specious claim that, by reason of association, members of these private fraternities hold “better” political “credentials” than you or I.

To get the big picture, please contemplate the further facts that roughly 80% of the members of Congress and every State legislature are also members of the EBB (entrenched bench-bar) AND the EBB’s strategy is to rig its own lines of “official” truth via Constitutionally repugnant statutes enacted by its members to provide a way for fabricating a folio of “judicial” rule-making by other members of its consortium parked on the bench by claims of squatters’ rights, so that Federal or State Attorneys General and their staff assistants, (who are also members of the entrenched bench-bar) may, in turn, prosecute the sly aspirations of their private association, that is, REVERSING roles with the body politic and setting themselves up instead as an “official” New World priesthood under color of law. And, since the main thrust of our laissez faire Constitutional system is against just such arrangements, this plot (or conspiracy, if you will) would have to be perpetuated by this back door route. In this regard, I quote Lieber on the matter of Civil Liberty:

“a very important guarantee of liberty is the division of government into three distinct functions, - legislative, administrative (or executive) and judicial. The union of these is absolutism or despotism on the one hand, and slavery on the other.”

With the foregoing in mind, I again draw your attention to the common denominator shared by people living off public payrolls in decision-making posts, but especially those operating in the courts, and remind you that Revenuers (like Cops, Sheriffs and FBI men) are only the fuzz, stooges and hitmen for the syndicate (union) of bar associates.

However, you may be of good cheer as all is not lost, for even a fair-to-middling poker player can call the hand of these fakers. Since Jefferson and Lincoln aren’t around to do it for me, and I suspect their purpose in handing us their stakes was that they expected people like you and me to carry forward on our own, the major part of my strategy is, in fact, calling the Adversary’s bluff. Moreover, DUTY obliges me to do this, so that I won’t be charged in the last round-up with letting down Lincoln, Jefferson or the less famous early Revolutionaries for our Republic, by failing to indict and challenge such an open and shut case of GUILT-BY-ASSOCIATION.

When my associates and I tackle the Adversary, we do so from all sides, and we do so for REAL PEOPLE as individuals against members of the entrenched bench-bar, as individuals, who are also REAL PEOPLE, even if they are rogues and scoundrels. By so doing, we avoid the pitfalls of becoming mere sayers of the WORD instead of DOERS. Hence, we can further side-step, among other things, the temptation to talk about conspiracies instead of challenging and proving them every step of the way. Thus, it is quite unnecessary for us to tell Conspirators that they are Conspirators. They already know THAT, so we don’t bother “carrying coals to Newcastle.” Conspiracy (or collusion, as it is known in the trade) is the occupational handicap of entrenched bar members. Indeed, it is the only reason for the existence of this come-lately Association.

Although we enjoy giving attorneys for Internal Revenue and State Tax Commissions their lumps, our special targets are “judges” and “prosecutors.” Whether the latter two titles operate in the State or Federal jurisdiction makes absolutely no difference to us, since both base their cause on the same pretensions.

For openers, we usually charge the Opposition with having ONE COLOSSAL NERVE by presuming authority to prosecute anyone in the NAME OF THE PEOPLE (body politic) OF ANY STATE or of the UNITED STATES, when they DON’T SPEAK FOR ME AND MINE, who are the PEOPLE - the BODY POLITIC of each State and of the Union. We never fail to point out that ‘judges’ and ‘prosecutors’ speak ONLY for the EBB brotherhood, their stooges and camp-followers.

The Opposition doesn’t like to hear this because it alerts them to several unpleasant facts, among them, THAT we are wise to their game; THAT by documenting ourselves through exhaustive researches, we have penetrated the cover on which their entire strategy relies and on which they have been framing their attacks on individuals; AND that we know as well as they, THAT the Body Politic isn’t out to destroy itself by putting its own upright members out on contract for any of the several ‘Crimes against the State’ raps that again seem to be in vogue. We hang them on their own rope by reminding them that this is the idea the EBB has trumped up in the furtherance of their design for take-over.

To further indict them of deviously conniving a rip-off of this Republic’s duly constituted mandate of a GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE, we tell them to drop their cover and correct the headlines of their gang-tackling assaults on individuals to more accurately read: “THE ENTRENCHED BAR versus MEMBERS OF THE BODY POLITIC IN THE PERSON OF SO and SO.” To disabuse them of any mistaken notions that we don’t catch on to what they’re up to, we advise them that the Income Tax is merely a scheme for extorting tribute for EBB “credentials” under color of “law,” just as the Stamp Act was a scheme for extorting tribute for Royal “credentials” b the same kind of ruse. To underscore this point, we frequently cite pertinent phrases from the Braintree (Mass.) resolves of 1765, when taxes were imposed on the Colonists without their consent in direct contradiction to the “grand and fundamental principle of the British Constitution THAT NO MAN SHOULD BE SUBJECTED TO ANY TAX TO WHICH HE HAS NOT GIVEN HIS CONSENT IN PERSON OR BY PROXY.” (Emphasis supplied)

It is a sad fact, however, that many seemingly bright members of the body politic labor under the mistaken ideas that Bar Association members, living in whole or in part off public payrolls as ‘judges’ or ‘prosecutors,’ are their Lords and Masters, (instead of the other way around) and have brilliant minds, when, in fact, like most other public hirelings, they are intellectual welfare cases.

There is yet another mistaken idea that demonstrates the mental confusion of would-be Tax Rebels. It seems to be that because ‘judges’ and ‘prosecutors’ supposedly are such bright fellows that they, of course, immediately get the message when this Office serves them in the Tax Rebel’s behalf. Unfortunately, since most ‘judges’ and ‘prosecutors,’ like other REAL PEOPLE, are boobs who suffer from grandiose delusions of self-importance, the combination creates a situation requiring that this Office jolt them by repeated services in order to get the message through.

However, on rare occasions, all it takes is one round with us for the REAL PEOPLE we are opposing in the enemy camp to know enough to quit. These are the handful who because they AREN’T intellectual-welfare cases, quickly recognize that by doing our homework we have the goods on them AND hence they instantly grasp the fact that to attempt to proceed against our defenses WOULD AMOUNT TO PROVING OUR CASE FOR US.

However, as aforesaid, more often than not to rescue the Tax Rebel, we must disperse the enemy with repeated attacks. It is the boobs and dullards on the opposite side whom we must continuously remind that they are in the unhappy position of proving our case for us.

For them, we spell our charges and challenges in greater detail: We accuse them of having contrived Bar fraternities as a means for usurping the courts and judiciary by association, and having temporarily succeeded in programming other public employees into the fantasy that they are somehow obliged by oath and duty to act only at the direction and under orders given by Bar Association members living off public payrolls, thus attempting to reverse roles with the body politic (the people) under pretensions of law, process and jurisdiction.

When they make moves toward bum-rapping Tax Rebels, we place the burden of proof where it belongs by telling them that their activities are attempts to willfully, omissively and evasively defeat the LAW OF THIS LAND by devious language conversions, enabling legislation and rule-making; AND THAT this is only what can be expected when one man, one group or one association of men has taken the law into their own hands to stack the deck in their favor by taking squatters’ rights on the courts; THAT their activities aim at the heart of the Free Will psychology of this Republic’s political mandate which enthroned the body politic (the people) in both power and control, placing upon each citizen the right and the duty to challenge the credentials of any one man, group or association of men, who might arise in combination against members of the body politic to destroy directly, or through their agents the volitional premise which is the basis of this government’s natural (common) law. We notify them that when propositions piously couched in the nomenclature of law, defeat or restrict the individual’s fundamental right of freedom of choice, the first casualty is NOT the individual victim of such abridgment, - the casualty is the LAW OF THE LAND, more commonly known as Due Process or Due Course of Law. Moreover, that such abridgments of Constitutional safeguards under statutory pretensions are not a new technique but an ancient ruse, indicting its practitioners as vectors and perpetrators of nefarious schemes for the primary purpose of Constitutional safeguards is to immunize the body politic against the means and methods by which despotism might again be launched to edge the people out of their Constitutionally fixed position and status of power and control.

We frequently ask them by what political theory they think public employees such as ‘judges,’ prosecutors and the like have been delegated the power and authority to coerce members of this self-governing body politic by threatening to prosecute and disseize them of their God-given rights, merely on the notions of ‘law’ and say-so of persons MAKING BELIEVE they are better than other people, BUT AREN’T. We ask them where they get off making believe that legislative frivolities (pretended legislation) conveniently planted on the books by the same association of persons in furtherance of their wicked design can take precedence over the Constitutional guarantees of our revolutionary self-government mandate, so that strivers can reverse roles with the body politic.

We put the wood to them by asking them to explain by WHAT POLITIC THEORY public hirelings get some fool notion that members of the body politic are NOT NOW AND NEVER WERE really meant to be the Lords and Masters under the political psychology of this Republic’s mandate and refer them to Articles IX and X in Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. We ask them if they are suggesting that the body politic should sand by and hold still (maybe as long as 200 years after the fact) to give some sleazy companionship or self-ordained association of men enough time to organize and hustle the bluff that the old English Adversary system with all its devious and arbitrary acts of Star Chamber premeditations, devoid of due process, has been alive and well all along, only waiting to be resurrected?

Having cited the Constitution of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, we then ask them to be kind enough to account for themselves; tell them we hold them ANSWERABLE AND ACCOUNTABLE for proposing to kangaroo up spurious processes and proceedings in pursuing the preposterous nonsense that the Old English Adversary System can still operate and take victims for “Crimes against the State” under the political psychology of this Republic’s mandate, where the body politic is supreme and is itself the State, and point out for them that they have put themselves in the middle by engineering contumacy for the Law of the land and showing their contempt for the powers and authority of their duly constituted Lords and Masters in this Land from sea to shining sea. Apparently even blockheads in the Adversary camp finally get the message when we draw them pictures, and decide that a retreat is in order. This makes it unnecessary for us to further review for them what came after the exchange of viewpoints with Great Britain 200 years ago.


SCRIPTURES

Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God is ONE God.” - deuteronomy 6:4

Hearken unto Me, O Jacob and Israel, My called; I am He; I am the first, I also am the last.” - isaiah 48:12

So will I make My Holy Name known in the midst of My people Israel…” - ezekial 39:7

Philip saith unto Him, Lord, show us the Father and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long a time with you and yet hast thou not known Me Philip? He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, show us the Father?” - st. john 14:8-9

But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” - matthew 15:24

And if ye be Christ’s (Christian), then are ye Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise.” - galatians 3:29


THE BIG LIE

In the Name of Jesus Christ and with full power and authority granted by Power of Attorney, we intend to expose one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated upon a people. The exposure is the IDENTITY of those who are not Israel. These, along with false preachers amongst many Christian denominations have laid a false claim that they are the Israelites of the Holy Bible. Any support of their false claim makes Jesus Christ a liar. Either their claim is false or Jesus would be a liar, take your choice. We refer you to the following Scripture:

Cain a son of “that wicked one” (Satan). - I john 3:12

Jesus identified these false Chosen people as descendants of the one who killed Abel. - matthew 23:24

Jesus identified them as children of Satan. - john 3:39-47

Jesus identified them as NOT of God! - john 8:47

Jesus identified them as NOT the children of Abraham! - john 8:39

They deny that they are Israelites! They say they were never in bondage. - john 8:33

Jesus identifies them in a parable. - matthew 13:35-39

His Sheep are the House of Israel. Jesus identifies THEM as NOT His sheep. - john 10:26-30

Jesus identifies one of them with Him as a devil! - john 6:70-71

JESUS CHRIST IS NOT A JEW! HE IS GOD!

If My people, which are called by My Name shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their son, and will heal their land.” - 2 chronicles 7:14


EDUCATION

By Col. Ben Cameron

It seems that this nation is in a dilemma regarding the problem of education. Why? Because the basic Christian concepts and the laws of our God are being violated. The Constitution of these United States is a divine instrument, divinely inspired from the Holy Scripture. It is God’s law for His people as a nation and for their government.

Let us take a look at what we have and what is happening. The Constitution is a contract by and between the States of the Union. By this contract the States created an agency known as the “federal government.” This contract enumerates or spells out the powers granted to this agent and limits these powers. The 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights makes it clear that any power not granted or listed in the Constitution for the federal agency, remains with the States and the people . There is NO power given to the federal agency in the matter of education or schools. Therefore this is an area “prohibited” to the federal agency. Education is a matter for the State and the local community under our Constitutional form of Republic.

We constantly hear from those who would subvert the Constitution that education is a Constitutional right. This concept is ERRONEOUS and FALSE! Education is NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT for any individual, whether or not he be a citizen of the U.S. or a citizen of a State.

Education is a PRIVILEGE. It is granted by the State and the citizens of the local school districts who own the schools in the districts. The federal agency has no Constitutional power to interfere in schools by any means and particularly by federal legislation which assumes or usurps the power to amend the Constitution. Legislators MAY NOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION! Only the States by a vote of the legislatures of three-fourths of the States may amend the contract between the States known as the Constitution. The federal legislation pertaining to the schools and the area of education is without question UNCONSTITUTIONAL, unlawful, illegal and without legal effect. It is further, a direct violation of the oath of office taken by every Member of Congress. It is malfeasance and misfeasance in office. It is a CRIMINAL ACT! When will a GOVERNOR of one of the States or the LEGISLATURE of one of the States protect the citizens of their State by REPUDIATING such unlawful acts of the federal legislature and other branches of the federal government? If these local representatives of the people continue to fail in the performance of their duties in this regard, dire results will prevail. We cannot as a nation and as a people, continue to permit the violation of the Word of God and receive anything but trouble and conflict.

The Constitution of these sovereign States in Union is “hanging by a thread.” It is time for God’s people to awaken from their slumber. DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION FROM ITS INTERNAL ENEMIES! KEEP THE FAITH!


ERROR BY OMISSION

Christian law teaches that “sin” is error or transgression of the Law. Sin can be error by “commission or error by omission.”

Have Governors and Legislatures of the once sovereign States of this Union committed sin by “omission?” Here are some examples which might let the reader reach his or her own conclusion:

A President of these United States ordered federal troops into the sovereign (?) State of Arkansas and thereby replaced the Executive (Governor) of that State with a military (federal) officer. The people of Arkansas elected their Governor and only the people of Arkansas can legally or lawfully replace their Governor. The President, therefore, violated Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution which reads: “The United States (federal government - Ed.) shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of government, and shall protect each of them (the States - Ed.) against invasion, and on application of the legislature or the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened), against domestic violence.” The same violation occurred in Mississippi and in Alabama. Neither the legislatures nor the Governors of these States made application to the federal government for protection against “domestic violence.” Use of federal power by the President or any federal official was a clear violation of that official’s Oath of Office to uphold, preserve and defend the Constitution, specifically Article IV, Section 4. Violation of the oath of office constitutes malfeasance and misfeasance in office and is a “felony” (A criminal act - Ed.).

Section 1385, Title 18, U.S. Code reads: “Whoever, excepting in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution, or by an Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a Posse Comitatus (police force - Ed.), OR OTHERWISE, to enforce the laws, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than two years or both.”

It is a felony for anyone, including the President, to violate the U.S. Criminal Code. The President or any other official of government is NOT ABOVE THE LAW. Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution reads: “The President, Vice-President and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed (from office - Ed.) on impeachment for and conviction of treason bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” (Impeachment means “bringing the charge”).

Section 4 of Title 18, U.S. Code (Misprision of Felony) reads: “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a Court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years or both.”

Article I, Section 5 of the U.S. Constitution gives the House of Representatives sole power of impeachment (bringing a charge against the President). Section 4 of Title 18, U.S. Code, makes this (impeachment) MANDATORY upon individual members of the House of Representatives when any member KNOWS that a crime has been committed by the President or other civil officers of the United States. Once a Congressman knows or has been advised (notified) of such crime it is his DUTY to bring impeachment proceedings against any civil officers of the United States involved. His failure to bring the charge (impeach) subjects the Congressman to arrest under provisions of Section 4, title 18, U.S. Code (Misprision of Felony). Congress and even Grand Juries of the people may indict and demand Courts-Martial of military officers who have similarly violated their oath of office which is to uphold, defend and preserve the CONSTITUTION against all enemies whomsoever, both foreign and domestic. Military officers have only promised to obey LAWFUL orders of their superiors and an order to violate the Constitution is NOT A LAWFUL ORDER and need not, and should not be obeyed by any military officer of the United States. A military officer is an officer of the United States by LAW (Act of Congress) and he need not receive military orders from any civilian or civil officer at any time nor under any circumstances. He is not under oath to support or uphold or defend anything BUT THE CONSTITUTION!

When a President unlawfully invaded the State of Mississippi with federal troops, it was explained that Section 332, Title 10 of the U.S. Code gave such authority. This statute reads: "Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstruction, combinations, or assemblages or rebellion against the authority of the United States makes it impracticable to enforce THE LAWS of the United States in any State or territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into federal service such of the militia of any State and use such armed forces as he considers necessary to enforce THE LAWS or to suppress the rebellion.”

In order for this statute (Section 332, Title 10) to be valid, there must have been a LAW (Act of a legislative body) to be enforced under the specific conditions. In the instance of crimes committed by federal officials in Mississippi, Arkansas and Alabama, this statute is NOT valid because no LAW was being enforced. Those who would use this statute as an excuse, then claim that COURT ORDERS or rulings of courts are LAWS. This is a fallacy! Where in the Constitution is the Judiciary given any power to MAKE A LAW or to LEGISLATE? The Congressman who holds to such a position is talking himself out of a job, for if the judiciary can legislate (make laws) then we would not need the Congressmen and they should be so advised and be left home at the next elections. The Constitution does NOT give the judiciary power even to “interpret” the Constitution! Only the power to “rule on cases at law” and no more. A ruling of a court upon a case at law is NOT the law of the land and never has been. Furthermore, the above-mentioned statute (Sec. 332, Title 10) is an “Act of Congress” and an Act of Congress CANNOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION. Only the STATES, who are the parties to the contract, may amend the Constitution; therefore Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution REMIANS IN EFFECT and HAS BEEN VIOLATED when federal forces invade a State as has been done in Arkansas, Alabama, and Mississippi.

At this point of our article we come to the matter of ERROR BY OMISSION. For purposes of better understanding, we will include some repetition here. Repetition is needed in this instance. The GOVERNORS and the LEGISLATURES of the States of Arkansas, Mississippi and Alabama are GUILTY OF SIN BY OMISSION. To support this charge, we submit the following:

Under basic Christian law, the Constitution of these United States is a CONTRACT (compact) between the separate, sovereign STATES of the Union. The federal government is an agent of the States under the contract and is SUBORDINATE to the parties of the contract (the States). That which is created is not above the creator. The States created the federal government and the federal government has only those powers granted to it by the States in the contract (Constitution), all other powers being retained by the States and the people. The office of Governor of sovereign States existed BEFORE the Union had a President and the Governors are sovereign Military Commanders of their respective States, with LAWFUL military power as the Commanders of their State Militia (National Guard). A Governor of a State is the sole power for the declaration of martial law in his State. The President of the United States is Commander-in-Chief of the federal Army and Navy by TITLE ONLY and NOT BY RANK. He is a “civilian” and has NO MILITARY POWER unless and until Congress declares war. He is a civilian and has no Constitutional power to order a militia of the several States into the service of the United States. This power is given only to the Congress by the Constitution. Neither the Congress, the Judiciary nor the federal Executive (President) have power to AMEND or alter the contract between the States known as the Constitution. This contract requires three-fourths of the States (Legislatures) to effect its amendment. The parties to the contract are the only ones who may amend or alter the contract and the federal government is NOT A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT. No power relative to education is given the federal government in the Constitution, therefore usurpation of power not granted is in violation of the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution and is a violation of the oath of office of federal officials (including Congress) who attempt such usurpation of power not granted by the States.

When officials of the federal government violate the Constitution or the laws of a sovereign state, the governor of that State has the lawful power to declare martial law in that State. In such instances, all officials of government including federal judges, federal defense department officials, justice department officials and all others who violate the laws of the State or who violate the military orders of the Commander-in-Chief of the military forces of the State (the Governor), can be arrested either in person or in absentia for violations of the laws of that State which is under martial law as declared by the Governor of the State.

To make the thesis of this article complete, the governors of Arkansas, Mississippi and Alabama could have issued the following Proclamation. Did they do it? No! Therefore they committed SIN BY OMISSION! This could have been done:

“The following EXECUTIVE ORDER is effective this date in the sovereign State of :”

  1. The Constitution of the United States of America is a contract between the separate, sovereign States of the Union; and

  2. The federal government, including all of its branches and agencies are subordinate creations of the States of the Union by the contract known as the Constitution of the United States of America, the federal government having been created by said States of the Union; and

  3. The federal government has only those powers granted to it by the States in the contract known as the Constitution and all others not specifically enumerated in the contract, the federal government does NOT have; and

  4. The GOVERNORS of the sovereign States of the Union existed prior to the existence and authority for a President of the United States and said Governors had and yet have MILITARY POWER as the Commanders of their respective State Militia; and

  5. The President of the United States is a “civilian” WITHOUT MILITARY POWER unless and until the CONGRESS declares a state of war; that his powers as Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy are by “TITLE” only and NOT BY RANK; the contract between the States (the Constitution) gives only the CONGRESS the power to order the militia of the several States into the service of the United States, and

  6. Neither the federal Congress, the federal Judiciary nor the federal Executive have the power to amend or alter the contract known as the Constitution; and

  7. Usurpation of any power not granted to the federal government by the contract known as the Constitution is a violation of the oath of office of any federal official; and

  8. WHEREAS, by the authority granted to me as the Chief Executive and Military Commander of the Militia (National Guard) of the sovereign State of , I hereby declare my authority to issue a declaration of MARTIAL LAW in the State of at any time without further notice. At the moment such declaration is made, all civil law and civil procedures cease to exist in the State of and all persons within the borders of are subject to such Martial law; and

  9. All personnel of the militia (National Guard) are subject to the orders and commands of the GOVERNOR of the State of , said military personnel of the National Guard may not be ordered into the service of the United States by other than the Congress of the United States. Said military personnel will obey orders of their lawful superior, the Governor of the State of only, any violations of said orders will subject said military personnel to trials by Courts-Martial in the State of ; and

  10. Upon the declaration of Martial Law by the Governor of the sovereign State of , all officials of government, both State and federal, will be subject to the laws of the State of and shall be arrested upon interference with the conduct of martial Law in the State of either in person or in absentia. Any representative of government officials who have been placed under military arrest in absentia will be considered to be the person of the official represented and upon entrance within the borders of the State of will be subject to military arrest as though he were the person under arrest in absentia.

All persons arrested in absentia under any declaration of Martial Law in the State of will be brought to the State of under provisions of Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States, for trial by military Courts-Martial in the State of ;

WHEREAS no powers have been granted to the federal government with respect to education, all acts of federal officials including judges of the federal judiciary, officials of the Executive Branch of the federal government and any other persons ot authorized by who interfere in the educational system of this State, will be arrested and tried in the State of .

 

\s\ GOVERNOR OF

Now, good readers, just what do you think would have happened if such an Executive Order had been issued by the Governor of any of the States which were unlawfully invaded by federal forces? Are we to uphold the Constitution or not? Are Governors bound by their oath of office or not? We hope that this article has stimulated some thought in the minds of those who know the law. In conclusion, sin has been committed by commission and sin has been committed by OMISSION.


 

THE UNITED NATIONS

AND

VIETNAM

(REPRINT)

The following article is an extract of information formerly distributed in Open Letters to the Representatives of the Sovereign (?) States by the COUNCIL FOR STATEHOOD, Mary M. Davison, Editor, P.O. Box 1131, North Miami, Florida.

In a past issue of Identity, we published an article entitled “The Communist Reverse Psychology.” We reemphasize this tactic of the anti-Christ forces in the world today. It is most important that this Communist tactic be understood by Christians who oppose Communism.

The younger generations, principally students of our Universities, are being fooled by the enemies of our Christian Constitutional Republic. The enemy WANTS US IN VIETNAM! Here is where they have used their Communist REVERSE Psychology. They PROTEST what they really want accomplished. In this way they N E U T R A L I Z E any anti-Communist opposition. It is as simple as that. When the Communists and their front-organizations are against it, then public opinion will place anyone who opposes it in league with the Communists. It is the communist TRICK and they know that this is the way most people think. They therefore neutralize any valid or sound opposition to the present Vietnam situation. Here are some of the facts that have been kept from the people:

President Johnson stated that we are at war in Vietnam in compliance with our solemn commitment under the UNITED NATIONS SEATO Treaty. He let this truth slip out during a press conference and there has been dead silence about the SEATO arrangements ever since. Officials of your (?) government do not want you to know about SEATO and the UNITED NATIONS connection with the Vietnam War. They have repeatedly denied that this is a UN war and these denials are the most reprehensible lies they have ever told.

A SEATO WAR IS A UNITED NATIONS WAR! SEATO is a UN Regional Agency and under Article 53 of the UN Charter, “The Security Council shall UTILIZE SUCH REGIONAL ARRANGEMENTS OR AGENCES FOR ENFORCEMENT ACTION UNDER ITS AUTHORITY. But NO enforcement action shall be taken WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL.” Article 54 of the UN charter reads: “The Security Council shall at all times be kept fully informed of activities undertaken or in contemplation under Regional Arrangements or by Regional Agencies…” Article 4 of the SEATO TREATY completes the picture in the conduct of a UN war in Vietnam: “Measures taken under this paragraph (enforcement) shall be IMMEDIATELY REPORTED to the Security Council of the United Nations.”

The head of the Security Council of the UN is Mr. Vladimir Suslov, an anti-Christ Soviet! Once the SEATO Treaty was invoked - and Mr. Johnson said it was - the entire war operation in Vietnam came under the direction of Mr. Suslov. This is why traitors in Washington, DC, dare not admit that the SEATO Treaty is in effect. Now, re-read Article 53 of the UN Charter. Can you picture Mr. Johnson or McNamara appearing on your TV screens and telling the American people that their sons are dying in the sink holes of Asia fighting “communists” - while every action taken or CONTEMPLATED in the future is reported to and cleared through a COMMUNIST, Mr. Suslov, sitting in the UN headquarters in New York? This is not the first time. It happened in Korea and in Cuba. Let us look at how it was done in Korea, then we will know what to expect in Vietnam.

Dean Acheson, a member agent of the Council on Foreign Relations, set the stage for the Korean war. It was his public declaration that the United States would not defend South Korea! When the North Korean Communists attacked, the United Nations declared “peace” against North Korea and called up OUR troops as they have been UNLAWFULLY authorized to do under the UNCONSTITUTIONAL UN Charter. We had the same disreputable crew in the State Department that we have now. When the war was authorized by the UN and its Security Council the State Department had the proclamation prepared and President Truman issued it. The U.S. Congress was not consulted then NOR HAS IT BEEN CONSULTED IN THE VIETNAM SITUATION! Article 24 of the UN Charter reads: “In order to insure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its members CONFER UPON THE SECURITY COUNCIL primary responsibility…and agree that in carrying out this responsibility, the SECRUTIY COUNCIL ACTS ON THEIR BEHALF.” Under this UNLAWFUL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL act, our so-called leaders (?) have UNLAWFULLY transferred responsibility for taking this nation to war, from the U.S. Congress to the Security council of the United Nations - the Constitution of the United States be damned! This is a clear violation of their oath of office to uphold, preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States and is a criminal act if not outright treason. Having UNLAWFULLY transferred full control of our Armed Forces to the United Nations, let us examine the manner in which these troops were employed in the Korean war.

As soon as the Korean war was started, the Soviet, Lt. Gen. Vasiliev was at that time Chairman of the UN Military Staff Committee. He took a leave of absence and went to Korea to lead the Red Chinese troops against the United Nations army composed principally of U.S. troops. In Korea - as in Vietnam - all activities or actions contemplated in the future - were reported to the UN Security Council whose head was another SOVIET COMMUNIST, Constantin Zinchenko. It was Zinchenko who received reports submitted to our State Department by Gen. MacArthur. Zinchenko then passed upon the reports and the actions contemplated by our forces in the future and then promptly informed the Communist Commanders in the field of Gen. MacArthur’s future plans. There is extensive sworn testimony by our highest military commanders in Korea as well as a declassified Defense Department document dated May 15th, 1954 captioned “The Truth About Soviet Involvement in the Korean War.” This document admits that Vasliliev - the on-leave Chairman of the UN Military Staff Committee - COMMANDED THE ENEMY TROOPS IN KOREA!

Secrecy and duplicity are keystones of the United Nations. They could not exist otherwise. During the Korean war they feared that intelligent U.S. commanders in the field would become aware of the top command in the UN. They attempted to conceal the position and the activities of the Communist Zinchenko. The UN Secretary General, Mr. Trigvie Lie, who had spent much time in the Soviet Union and who was rumored to have served on the Soviet Presidium, established a three-man UN Committee known as the Executive Military Authority of the UN with great powers, under Mr. Zinchenko, of course. One of these powers was to fire the UN Commander-in-Chief (Gen. MacArthur) and TO REPLACE HIM! Details of this performance are recorded in Senate Document No. 87, pages 653 to 659. Trigvie Lie, in his book “In the Cause of Peace,” pages 334-335, tells how he needed a closer contact (a watch dog) with General MacArthur. He sent a very special person, a resident of Africa, Col. Alfred G. Katzin. Anything the American Commanders failed to report to the Communist head of the UN Security Council would be taken care of by the watch dog Katzin. Gen. MacArthur had discussed his plans for the Inchon landings with Mr. Katzin who had opposed the action. Gen. MacArthur made the Inchon landings in spite of Katzin’s opposition and without his being made aware of the final decision. Our troops had been forced into a position by top-side directions of the communist Zinchenko in the UN to where there was no alternative to surrender except be pushed into the sea. The Inchon landings saved our troops from a Communist-led UN surrender and was the real reason for the dismissal of Gen. MacArthur. Senate Document No. 87 on page 654 relates that the “Executive Military Authority of the United Nations” was authorized to designate the Commander-in-Chief of the UN Military Forces AND TO REPLACE HIM! President Truman could not fire the Commander-in-Chief of the United Nations Military Forces! The executive Military Authority of the UN under the Soviet COMMUNIST Zinchenko had the sole authority to do this!

The politicians in Washington, DC, dare not let us know who is running the war in Vietnam! Who is the Vasiliev in North Vietnam? Who is the Katzin in Vietnam? Who is the commander-in-Chief in Vietnam?

Officials of government in Washington, DC, have absolutely NO AUTHORITY over the Vietnam war. The Soviet COMMUNIST Mr. Suslov has the ultimate authority. He is the man through whom all contemplated future actions must be cleared. He knows how many troops will be deployed ad where. He will know every move we make and will relay all such information in advance to the Communists!

The reason “democracy” fails is that there are always more inferior men than superior men. When the masses vote they tend to elect inferior men. The inferior men in the time destroy the government and bring destruction upon the people. There is a tremendous hypocrisy abroad in the land. Those who prate loudly about “free elections,” “one man, one vote” and the “democratic process” are the UNELECTED bureaucrats in the capitols and the devotees of the UNELECTED, UNLAWFUL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL United Nations. You are seeing the sovereignty of the States of the Union being snatched from your hands. You are witnessing a concentration of power at the federal level which you know is without any legal sanction. You are totally unaware of the source of this transfer authority. You are witnessing the inevitable suicide of “democracy!”

On the surface, the Washington government would appear to be a rapidly-expanding autocracy bent on spreading its questionable authority over the States - and the whole world. Yet the fact is that the Washington government is NOTHING BUT THE DANCING PUPPET OF THE UNITED NATIONS and its behind-the-scenes operators. CHRISTIAN AMERICA - IT IS TIME TO CLEANSE THE LAND!

ABOUT TAXES - why do we not amend our State Constitution to fix the amount of dollars that can be spent by State and Municipal governments annually and then require government to budget within the dollars available? Why do we permit government to do what we as individuals may not do - set the budget and then tax the people to meet the budget? Can we operate our personal business in this manner?


 

THE TRUTH ABOUT

BRITISH ISRAEL

There seems to be a great deal of misunderstanding about the so-called “British Israel,” whatever it might be. When one mentions the word “Israel” in relation to the Bible, and particularly when one attempts to identify the true Israel of the Bible, others who disagree will immediately say, “Oh, that is British Israel.” When they are asked “What is British Israel?” they cannot answer.

If they can attempt an answer, they present the propaganda of the enemies of Jesus Christ and the smear that has been placed upon a former group or association of some kind who they say are “subversive.” As far as we can see, there have been serious theological errors propounded as “British Israel.” For instance, some claim that British Israel claimed that only Anglo-Saxons constitute all of the “House of Israel” (with the exception of the tribe of Judah who they believed were Jews). If this be true, we would disagree with British-Israel in that we know that ALL of the white-Christian nations make up the “House of Israel.” These are not only the Anglo-Saxons but the Scandinavian, Nordic, Basque, Lombard and Germanic peoples. The Germanic peoples are the true House of JUDAH and no “Jew” of today has descended from Abraham’s stock (Israelites) NOR FROM THE HOSUE OF JUDAH OR THE TRIBE OF JUDAH!

Most of the battle that exists in some areas of the “right wing” movement against British Israel however, is uncalled for. Like any other group of Christians, they are all anti-Communist, opposed to the United nations and are classified by the Jews as being anti-Jewish. Anyone acquainted with the world communist-socialist conspiracy, knows that it is a Jewish conspiracy. This is not the hour for division amongst those who would stand for Christ and Country in this struggle.

Ample volumes of Jewish literature establishes that they (the Jews) know that the white Christian nations are Israel and that the Jews are NOT Israel, even though this might be the opposite of what has been erroneously taught to Christians for many centuries. In fact, JESUS Christ himself made it clear that the Jews are NOT Israel when He said, “I come not but for the lost sheep of the House of Israel” and then He said to the Jews that they (the Jews) are not His sheep. If His sheep are the House of Israel and the Jews are NOT His sheep, then the Jews cannot be the House of Israel. If the Jews are the Israelites, then Jesus Christ would be a liar - and when Clergymen preach that Jesus Christ is a Jew, they do err and make the Word of God of no effect.

It is apparent that the critics of so-called British Israel do not criticize their Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Lutheran, Episcopalians, Roman Catholic and other denominational friends , who in the error of their theology, make the Jews God’s Chosen people and Jesus Christ a Jew, when all the truth of the Holy Scripture says otherwise.

One can best evaluate the truth and sincerity of people today in the struggle to save America, by what that person is doing or saying with an unswerving approach year in and year out against the common enemy. Sometimes the best evaluation of truth can be determined by the animosity, fear and hatred that is directed against it by the Anti-Defamation league, B’nai B’rith (ADL), the A.D.A. members of the Communist Party and their “fronts.”

White Christians (God’s Israel) - It is YOUR destiny to save America. UNITE in the Name of Your GOD Jesus Christ, regardless of denomination.


 

A STORY ABOUT A FLAG

I once wrote a book which had a religious background. When it came time to design the cover of the book, something made me include the confederate Flag along with the Statue of Liberty. I cut the photo of the Statute of Liberty in order that only 13 stars appeared. I wanted the same number of stars that appeared on the Confederate Flag.

Somehow a vision kept appearing and the story of the Israelites leaving Egypt was ever in my mind. I remember that there were originally 12 tribes of Israel when Abraham’s children returned to the land of Egypt where their ancestors had been many years before. I recalled that in the days of Enoch and Job, 144,000 of the sons of god had gone into the land of Egypt from the upper Tarim-basin where Eden was located. There they had built the great city called “On.” They built great libraries and the centers of learning. It was then that they were known as the Hyksos Shepherd Kings. The Name of their God was YA-VEH and shortened in the changes of language to the word YA. As a result the people were sometime referred to as Ar-Ya which means children of Ya. Today we would say Aryan. Today we also sing Halleluja or Hail Ya.

As this picture continued in my mind, I saw the marriage of Joseph to the daughter of the High Priest of the City of On and the two sons by this marriage Ephraim and Manasseh. I saw Jacob crossing his hands and blessing these two sons saying “Upon these two lads shall my name Israel be called.” I recalled that this action made two tribes of the tribe or House of Joseph. It also made the total of the tribes of Israel 13 instead of the original twelve. As my vision continued, I saw Moses leading the 13 tribes of Israel out of Egypt. I saw him place the tribe of Levi (Priesthood) in the center. There were three tribes on the East, three on the West, three on the North, and three on the South. All tribes had their standards before their tents.

As I looked more closely I saw that the standards were the twelve signs of the Zodiac and then I remembered my studies of the history of the great Viking Kings of Scandinavia with the twelve signs of the Zodiac behind their great banquet tables. Did they know that they were part of the so-called “Lost tribes of Israel” who had gone North and West through the Caucasus and had become known as Caucasians?

My vision of a Flag continued as I stared at the Flag of the Confederacy. I saw a great Cross as it covered the field of red. The Cross was blue and it contained 13 stars. There was one star in the center, three on the East, three on the West, three on the North and three on the South. This is the same position that Moses placed the tribes of Israel upon their departure from Egypt.

Then one day I visited some friends in the South. Driving through the great Bible belt, I saw the Flag of Jesus Christ ad Christianity as the State symbol of Mississippi. Then on through to Alabama where it flew over the capital at Montgomery. It was the same Flag. The Flag of the children of Adam or the Adamic race. Here they were fighting again to preserve their racial inheritance. They know not why. I suddenly remembered the Apostle Paul where in the book of Romans he asked “Who are the Israelites?” Then his reply in the Book of Galatians “If ye be Christ’s (Christian) then ye are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise.” As I visited with some men whom I had not met before, they were looking at the cover of my book. One suddenly said, “You are not a Southerner but a Westerner. Why did you put the confederate Flag on the cover of your book?” Before I could think, I answered. It came from the blue. My question to him was instantaneous. “How many stars do you see on the Cross?” He said “Thirteen.” I then asked “Why are there 13 stars on the Cross of the Confederate Flag when there were only ELEVEN Confederate States?” His answer was a blank stare. So - this is my story about a Flag. A Flag that will fly forever.